Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-05.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 27 October 2016 14:53 UTC

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSL7ywsnz8goa3QkC7xxMNUyw0V6C8LUBfgABFOwD//9RSAIAAHTuA
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:52:39 +0000
Message-ID: <D4378BF4.85C60%acee@cisco.com>
References: <147750904648.2927.9899493365277493754.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161026191854.GD37101@Vurt.local> <011701d23045$f59009e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161027114418.GT37101@Vurt.local> <D43773E7.85C0A%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D43773E7.85C0A%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.200]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9C1EFB96D54CDD4D9911CE02B828F78E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hLQiBwbWStPG8uqlfd0UBr678N0>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-05.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:53:30 -0000


On 10/27/16, 9:08 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>Hi Job, Tom, 
>
>On 10/27/16, 7:44 AM, "Idr on behalf of Job Snijders"
><idr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of job@ntt.net> wrote:
>
>>Hi Tom,
>>
>>On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:31:32PM +0100, t.petch wrote:
>>> a minor administrative point; the RFC Editor commonly imposes a
>>> constraint of five names on the first page, and this list has now grown
>>> to six.  A common practice is to have just one name on the front, that
>>> of the pen-holder, and list the others at the back, differentiating, at
>>> the back, between those who have made a major contribution and those
>>>who
>>> have not.  Cutting out one from six may be more problematic:-(
>>
>>This is not a problem. Looking at the last 1000 published RFCs, roughly
>>3% of RFCs have more than 5 authors listed. If anything, it will be
>>something between the RFC Editor and the Authors of this draft.
>
>I know that as OSPF chair I’ve asked for exceptions to this rule when we
>believe all the authors have made a substantive contribution.

Note that I’m not in a position to make the call for this draft and only
wanted to point out that the RFC author limit is a guideline as opposed to
a hard and fast rule.

Thanks,
Acee 


>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>
>
>
>>
>>Thanks for your concern!
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>
>>Job
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Idr mailing list
>>Idr@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

[Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-… internet-drafts
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… Job Snijders
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… t.petch
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… Job Snijders
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… Acee Lindem (acee)
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… Acee Lindem (acee)
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… John G. Scudder
Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-commun… Susan Hares