RE: [Idr] MInutes for IDR

Hi Sue,

Comments on the minutes re bgp-tunnel:

	IPv6 over IPv4 MPLS (Francis LeFaucheur, presenter)
	---------------------------------------------------
Right spelling for my name is "Francois Le Faucheur"
I suggest listing the draft being discussed
(draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-tunnel-04.txt)

	The draft presents a technique, which will be coordinated with
V6OPS 

s/which will be/which has been/

	through the ADs, for providing IPv6 service over an existing
IPv4 MPLS 
	cloud, without the cloud needing to be V6-aware. The proposed
solution 
	is intended to require no protocll extensions (see 

s/is intented to require no/does not require any/

	draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgp-ipv6). It carris labels in MP-BGP.  The 

Please remove the reference to draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgp-ipv6 above. The
stamement about not requiring protocol extensions in bgp-tunnel has
nothing to do with l3vpn-bgp-ipv6.

	requiriemens are stated in 

	  draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-03.txt.

	Draft 04 is underway, and will clarify some MUST/SHOULD
terminology, 
	expand on the inter-AS cases, and add additional detail on
security.

There is some confusion here. The 03-->04 changes related to the
bgp-tunnel draft (not to isp-scenario). These changes have already been
done in bgp-tunnel-04. 
So the above should read:
"bgp-tunnel-04 includes the following changes over the previous version:
clarify some MUST/SHOULD terminology, expand on the inter-AS cases, and
add additional detail on security."

	Publication of this specification will involve coordinated
documents 
	between V6OPS and IDR, consistent where possible and different
where 
	necessary. For example, the V6OPS document will carry label
SAFI/AFI 
	while the IDR document will carry VPN SAFI/AFI.

This paragraph mixes everything up. It should read:
"draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-tunnel-04.txt specifies support for global IPv6
reachability services while draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgp-ipv6-03.txt specifies
support for IPv6 VPN services. The two documents are consistent wherever
they can be and are only different where needed (eg bgp-tunnel uses
"labeled IPv6" AFI/SAFI while l3vpn-bgp-ipv6 uses "VPN-IPv6" AFI/SAFI).

	After the editorial changes are complete, the document will go
out for 
	last call and implementation survey.

I believe what was agreed was that the document was ready for Last Call
and the Last Call was going to be issued right after Wash IETF. So I
suggest replacing previous paragraph with something like:
"The document will go out for Last Call after this meeting".

Thank you

Francois

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr