IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-08

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 23 December 2022 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29E1C14CE29 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 05:59:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3uU9e4B99kHt for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 05:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF2BDC14F725 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 05:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id y16so4666570wrm.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 05:59:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LayXAPG01Vo4xm5m+by+BDRX65mb1JIZC+yT+2SYmbw=; b=fkytBqwRZ8qMVq5TCY4lRGFTco4Bz6nDBDd+BNmt0Xxliv7j5K9RPsVnHVh+3Uzg4m s863cS2qjmuf9dN/38FUhc80ueXHZH0ZG4dTf4cFI7xaJ0+dGITPsZIzi58ZmBU0FFz6 r6vIg9zwbhUrFhITdO6S0dV7K03i4axLA7y6Vx/Urpi15x93G+BIiHhjM6pY0JIPWaYu 6NI3yJP3faD7b8+k0t7KVnLyreVZrwlLkxzyeVE8hf0oz3IvVyZ5IMg+qAHuCRdZoxDa jM0tlFYVgDSRb9FKHERpKjXp8VHbR2zxJ4SS9A1pzxWPB6FjrKkqFUyEzeSV780gobAc MCWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LayXAPG01Vo4xm5m+by+BDRX65mb1JIZC+yT+2SYmbw=; b=KfZMeO3NltTOn977zm7ab+0M/aKjq7PHUIeKpF0xWBA7ik51UlEtRl4zWUQ61EpWh0 yUY9ktgC0UPlJQD9ku5igPLsbE67Ut0nuqLhn4wFeTfLkkgyQ8QXtr9k3HQHsq9JuEH+ 3rBv6CbsLfdV5EH3JVKxRB2wLV38QMXsqvAqrnjRd7HE9gxUPHb669Oy3rW7zKzhXcdX +HCpQTSz6SRtGeVOObp505YRGGaEoLGeCOaa1eKJEBFQulC33xd3tlZ96DDHZQFiFEau xddHry99aKaKPmq0r0zrRZ4Fjg84vUeDsRnBiZOh1uB8MPf+aTWwryCpTU4bxK6m+ahh YX7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqhNalzNupPVsuWNoYLODPVFbeVrQC1fwYatb9XhsfvRa+Z1lWC bNIfZ1HOXOs48XV2EJsmfs9IGBukpCm/qLixixpSCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvmFWs2LiL/kZuajNLK2ujPEkNF6wIEK+JOmbRWRX1FTgFA/Io6IqQEx5u/FTo3xNpPM1VmC2j3H4a/YdtsFxc=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f508:0:b0:242:7cd4:3448 with SMTP id q8-20020adff508000000b002427cd43448mr483520wro.438.1671803950012; Fri, 23 Dec 2022 05:59:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMESsw_kC_V-7px1xNbgxsinWW0RFUrugDmu2ziF8ioxqxCRQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsw_kC_V-7px1xNbgxsinWW0RFUrugDmu2ziF8ioxqxCRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:58:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHiBZnhs3hQnz8xcRwo541=83p0NJaP69h-S_XhzFuTDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities@ietf.org, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000933b0105f07f30a7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/U_5gZ-RYbK7pYDhMA25ck__z0I4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-08
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 13:59:16 -0000

Hi Alvaro,


> (2) Should this document be marked as replacing
> draft-ietf-idr-registered-wide-
>     bgp-communities?  I know
> draft-ietf-idr-registered-wide-bgp-communities and
>     draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities were both adopted at about the same
>     time...


Let me just respond to this one.

The split into separate documents happened on the request of WG. One
contains protocol work the other one (registered) is a place for allocating
a number of types to unambiguously encode data to address most
commonly heard requirements.

IMO while "registered" can not proceed before the protocol however it can
bring value and could/would be pursued after the protocol spec is
finalized. It could also be a base for asking IANA to allocate codepoints
for those wide communities to be well recognized.

Many thx,
Robert.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email