Re: [Idr] draft-walton-bgp-add-paths-06.txt as IDR WG document

Hi,

I've read enough to believe that the proposed mechanism is sufficient to
advertise and withdraw multiple paths.  I am ok with this part. 

However, one key thing that isn't obvious from this draft is how the
active path(s) (the ones(s) actually inserted in the FIB and being used
for forwarding traffic) of the advertising speaker is differentiated
from other non-active paths.

Cheers, Manav 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Yakov Rekhter
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 1.21 AM
> To: idr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Idr] draft-walton-bgp-add-paths-06.txt as IDR WG document
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Please send your comments on the attached. The deadline for comments
> is Dec 12, 2008.
> 
> Yakov.
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> Date:    Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:44:00 -0500
> From:    "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
> To:      Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>, skh@ghs.com
> cc:      Inter-Domain Routing List <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: draft-walton-bgp-add-paths-06.txt as IDR WG document
> 
> The authors would like to request that draft-walton-bgp-add- 
> paths-06.txt be adopted as an IDR WG document.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - --John
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr