Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-03 (5/31 to 6/14)

Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net> Tue, 02 June 2015 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4D41AC3C8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hfSJERTHiEXj for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0775.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:775]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356E81A7008 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 04:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hannes@juniper.net;
Received: from hannes-mba.local (66.129.239.11) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.172.22; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:20:29 +0000
Received: from hannes-mba.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hannes-mba.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EAD1395161; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:20:23 +0200
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <20150602112023.GB6151@hannes-mba.local>
References: <009e01d09c1a$cace12d0$606a3870$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <009e01d09c1a$cace12d0$606a3870$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Originating-IP: [66.129.239.11]
X-ClientProxiedBy: CY1PR0101CA0024.prod.exchangelabs.com (25.162.170.34) To CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB442;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <CO1PR05MB4423760D99807D59133E77CCBB50@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(520003)(3002001); SRVR:CO1PR05MB442; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB442;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 05954A7C45
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(24454002)(199003)(47776003)(66066001)(83506001)(19580395003)(76506005)(64706001)(54356999)(50986999)(50466002)(76176999)(46406003)(23726002)(15975445007)(77096005)(68736005)(92566002)(106356001)(122386002)(122856001)(77156002)(97736004)(62966003)(5001860100001)(4001350100001)(81156007)(4001540100001)(5001830100001)(110136002)(5001960100002)(189998001)(97756001)(86362001)(19580405001)(105586002)(230783001)(33656002)(561944003)(40100003)(2950100001)(46102003)(98436002)(101416001)(87976001)(579124003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB442; H:hannes-mba.local; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2015 11:20:29.4110 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB442
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Wqc44fIUyjEmpLL8puoW1xQLyog>
Cc: keyupate@cisco.com, idr@ietf.org, draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe@tools.ietf.org, cfilsfil@cisco.com, raysaikat@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week WG adoption call for draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-03 (5/31 to 6/14)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:20:47 -0000

hi sue,

have worked with the authors and they have addressed all my concerns;

so, support as a non-author;

/hannes

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:26:46PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
|    This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
|    draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-03.txt.  The authors (Stefano,
|    Clarence, Saikat, Keyur, Mach and Jie) should indicate if they know if any
|    IPR.  The draft can be found at:
| 
| 
| 
|    [1]http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/
| 
| 
| 
|    In the discussion, please consider:
| 
|    a)      Does this addition to BGP-LS for exporting BGP egress point
|    topologies provides useful information for BGP deployments in the
|    internet,
| 
|    b)      Are there scaling issues in adding this information to BGP-LS, and
| 
|    c)       The technical merits and issues with this proposal.
| 
| 
| 
|    Susan Hares and John Scudder
| 
| 
| 
| References
| 
|    Visible links
|    1. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-previdi-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/

| _______________________________________________
| Idr mailing list
| Idr@ietf.org
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr