Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-33: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 30 July 2019 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747FA1202B7; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkh0B8Hi53YS; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D066D1202AE; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id s49so28658578edb.1; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=izo+Tdyp8WDLz5flk6Aze3vtAeURnkcsMekZJXtN3Bw=; b=FEa8J7F1CaHw80xYroSv4n8M7c1empFHRl4vsK39ra4ip2JtuUOm/hfTwmv6V5n/XL kXSRwIquNnfBVVRLcTE8pe1Xo/YqS/1TE22D9JuhamKSXx/TMx221YaAeXKDD39/oXzZ Bi0eNh/4HLf3pORSBhbo5YMzdQ3Mq6QXrYuncQnR5oTdkUffvY2svtGf9Sbj/QSExJ9t Z5xN6vivWV0pzhpl2YWQGBPtBJOJv+8eUpqYSlOzH14sTCWBfOFZOssSpn77xpa6bZsy A3PygW2WylnhnYXvPbfOnlhV9MfA29MooSBIDhNkh5pli6tugsYUVmyVlUPUCt+Tps8R /0pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=izo+Tdyp8WDLz5flk6Aze3vtAeURnkcsMekZJXtN3Bw=; b=kkfrpNdcMFxM7MuCgTdcrmNsoV4gjdZ1oXB2UA2pnqp62VTYSIsUb3Nzsks5LWxV+o Yi/aKnRh1tK5IBg/hyAtmjVmGzT5eEjcVsL2zJa6Qi+JDGUeUfJFoyR6kQPtiyaCQY9M gF/t+ziY8+erQZXuIRgvaopRzSobzZtz6IYavVlbu4FcnZ3VndZZSo546R7RsjyMYGGh YPyfdD64+RX/XFSdiWYOTCFTeAuxFbAd7JMqRqYfpXZpHsZ+egIl8BUls9epnyqsL+u4 0zT3DhTENMd8SpZTXg4uLr2pZCShF+AVRZMF0Wnl3TjRlF1UrVXPoqHU0aXHjSS72c7e 3Vbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXU0s0qDGnlfmzXJ8HZEl5U3dr2imn52ihuVFbN0WRDzCe0Ne/0 MoMc7UL8IkL+UHMTcWkfl8BTTOt4dA4ML8mkPrXtYs3I
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzGvHSAVEtC9+hXvWabFJwbnqrtgs2HMP04Shtyp35gN6B34HMLQAm3vNcnYdKAAQP1l8bUwuXN7y2nv+KtUhw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:24c1:: with SMTP id f1mr89996812ejb.285.1564513234297; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:00:32 -0400
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <003b01d546f2$ebf946f0$c3ebd4d0$@ndzh.com>
References: <156449387998.2643.18137174091685834097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsz6gDtk=CytjQPDRSPiWvRB0X-R4MP2fZeiTRH_Z-2c_w@mail.gmail.com> <003b01d546f2$ebf946f0$c3ebd4d0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:00:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxSobNrqOQP0YwvzJ2gPFQrkgnDN2dKHpDRbv7BFoaPVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: idr-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000093acba058eea9f4e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XR8UpvsR--spFeHv5Q1wgcttXAs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-33: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:00:48 -0000

On July 30, 2019 at 12:22:13 PM, Susan Hares (shares@ndzh.com) wrote:

Sue:

Hi!

On #2, the Discussion from the WG (over long period of time) suggested that
this exact statement was not clearly stated in RFC4271.


This is the text that Mirja highlighted:

   If a BGP message with a Length greater than 4,096 octets is received
   by a BGP listener who has not advertised the Extended Message
   Capability, the listener MUST treat this as a malformed message, and
   MUST generate a NOTIFICATION with the Error Subcode set to Bad
   Message Length (see [RFC4271] Sec 6.1).

First of all, if a BGP router doesn't support Extended Messages it means it
doesn't support this document...so we can't Normatively tell them what to
do.

rfc4271/§6.1 (Message Header Error Handling) specifies what to do if, among
other things, the length is greater than 4096...so that would be what the
speaker who doesn't support this document would do.

NEW>
   If a BGP message with a Length greater than 4,096 octets is received
   by a BGP listener who has not advertised the Extended Message
   Capability, the listener will generate a NOTIFICATION with the Error
   Subcode set to Bad Message Length ([RFC4271], Section 6.1).


Thanks!

Alvaro.