Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-00 and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-02 (2/15/2024 to 2/29/2024)
Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 01 March 2024 16:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E7EC14F5FB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:15:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R5D_e1uzhBTk for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:15:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC92EC15152D for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:15:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a3566c0309fso316491166b.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 08:15:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709309736; x=1709914536; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gJNss8Su/ZfLEavZKop9/Y/dZmEMiK4SMobwnjJg/UA=; b=PjE6c4C+viJK+outK7w63ppL9ReKauF50gRw/Wi433qPPR64epR2GefXkK5jiBVTcZ O36bRQoumhPBVbkk0MFM44oGi6vgG0zvVeAbw0C1jZr+RLtPmytWx9fmCVYTNF5oXdPp 5iAr/ByJiTKg1zwARA2+BGANp55F+HBl10YUWBxhF0m24uM+GrZEF70yaUDatKtQIKH4 6Nst8o6S+u/psAhtFcziUnWzt/09GjZkVgU2GVS+D4wB1lqgfmkZbQO3zPPJTxKviDK8 Faz6gyfLxLTkmVx9pVCkvDWArIC/5E23TgiLeByRvdH1VIJI8xH4N9zrZAqL25btTPvD 9P4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709309736; x=1709914536; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gJNss8Su/ZfLEavZKop9/Y/dZmEMiK4SMobwnjJg/UA=; b=KSiyb7rB9oDL3LOusidiYF8MDfgT6kyU8PSmwsXW5kv9jAH0AI8OXYxxJQazuEq0xG cnpRVGIe9VSUAUz3YyndQmQF+OmkmEgDIKALfY6Zt7cAD7ndfM1E3b77dIele2OpMLTv kHfYsyjNJkgqp2hrMZ84YZepaGXdengaPR3+YvKg7732euBvkEbXA8SUiG6ZpsnIV7CN byyCAOYFr02UjRS1UCVJdBPJi4CLbNnDZnUnpPOudjoUHSHGLjpsNGaw/TxPm+b035LZ Rsp5ZAkYQP7MvnWgGbhhW8giE+qrwVJJl9zWYk+Cw1wMvpvfxSTp/uQ1dDTA6pP7mWg4 U5xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy0tD9KmD9oumT+ujskJBwpNFPFCqCDIi7u4qoSCluuaq54p/yI 9d3PniOdVEDmftYsrzPj7b/qSXh0mkmNK/KGCt0r2hkvkNsJ+QkLFZt6GbuSF/WVHkFxfxwDeru VUMeUeZEwYKgASANllXbp4x4ZeRf7mltWEuQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGS6qCkmy2fAK87NjgWmjqYDcPDpJysheLX30Z7lPzNKT1SnaiyUAwUk9lmxr/e6Di9FGul5dEUn+AoC6wD/Ok=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4951:b0:a44:42f4:dc51 with SMTP id f17-20020a170906495100b00a4442f4dc51mr1520359ejt.49.1709309736019; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 08:15:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR08MB48572F86EA48D3FDB532EA21B34D2@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR08MB48572F86EA48D3FDB532EA21B34D2@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 21:45:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPziYhxnazHQT0YdhnVoGoq7PfpW4M6ZmAKCGSmdUhMEZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a06ba006129baf9f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/YRLVSkzkVI1s7s_AC0s_x7pFkFo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-00 and draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-02 (2/15/2024 to 2/29/2024)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:15:40 -0000
Hello All, These drafts (including the original WG draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy that was split as asked for by our AD & WG Chair/shepherd) have not got any responses from members during this WGLC that is supposed to end today. This is a bit surprising considering that it is normatively referenced by many documents from this WG and other WGs: - normative: 12 WG drafts - informative: 6 WG drafts and 2 RFCs I didn't count the individual drafts (but there are many). I request WG members to please review and respond to this WGLC. Thanks, Ketan (as the editor of these documents for the WG) On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 3:43 AM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote: > Greetings IDR: > > > > This begins a 2-week WG LC on the following two drafts created from the > text in > > draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-18 – that the IDR WG approved for > publication: > > > > - draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-00 (proposed standard) > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi/ > > - draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-02 (experimental) > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext/ > > > > The Authors (per IETF policy) are asked to respond to this message with a > > message indicating whether they know of any undisclosed IPR as the > documents stand now. > > Please note there are 3 IPR declarations on these drafts. > > > > History: > > ====== > > After reviewing draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-18, Andrew Alston > (IDR RTG AD) > > asked that draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy be split into two > parts because > > some segment types (C-L) did not have two implementations. > > Therefore, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-srsegtypes-ext-02 contains the text for > > Segment types C-L. This split has been discussed at IETF meetings. > > > > Since Andrew Alston had personally implemented this draft, > > he also asked for additional reviews on procedures. > > > > During this review, the procedures regarding the link to RFC9012 were > improved. > > > > Issues in call: > > ============ > > During the WG should note that the procedures specified in > > draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-00 do the following: > > > > 1. Only apply to the SR Policy Tunnel (15) + SR Policy SAFI > 2. Do not require any of the TLVs defined in RFC9012 for other tunnel > types > 3. May ignore TLVs defined in RFC9012 for other tunnel types > 4. Do not use the validation process in RFC9012, and depend on the > SRPM to validate content. > 5. Makes changes to Color Extended Community [RFC9012] to add to > 2-bits [C, O] > > To support “color-only” (CO) functions of section 8.8 of [RFC9256] > > > > C0 – type 0 (00) – Specific end-point match (Match endpoint that is BGP > NH) > > type 1 (01) - Specific or null end-point match (BGP NH or null > (default gw)) > > type 2 (10) – Specific, null, or any end-point match (BGP NH, > Null, or any endpoint) > > type 3 (11) – Reserved > > > > The SR Policy Tunnel functions in this draft use BGP as a transport > mechanism for the > > Information contained in the SR Policy. > > > > Please note that these procedures split the context validation away from > the > > BGP module into the SRPM module. This split is similar to the BGP-LS > split > > syntax validation from context validation. > > > > There are multiple implementations of this technology as detailed at: > > > https://wiki.ietf.org/group/idr/BGP-Implementation-report/draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-implement > > > > The WG members are asked to confirm their agreement to the changes made in > this document. > > > > If there are questions, please ask them on this mail thread. Please note > any errors in the call are mine (and not the authors). > > > > Cheerily, Sue > > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr >
- [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-00 a… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Stefano Previdi IETF
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Dhanendra Jain
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)
- [Idr] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: WG LC on draft-ietf-idr… Paul Mattes
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Idr] Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: WG LC on draft-ietf… Kausik Majumdar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… chen.ran
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… linchangwang
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… 岳胜男
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Nat Kao
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… 王亚蓉
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Mengxiao.Chen
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Qiuyuanxiang
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… 梁艳荣
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… 王亚蓉
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Martin Vigoureux (Nokia)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Wenying Jiang
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Nat Kao
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Nat Kao
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… liu.yao71
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Dhananjaya Rao (dhrao)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Nat Kao
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-… Susan Hares