New Issue AS path
"Natale, Jonathan" <JNatale@celoxnetworks.com> Thu, 03 October 2002 21:05 UTC
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA05152 for <idr-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:05:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 0F1289134D; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:07:03 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id CC40991351; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:07:02 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFB29134D for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:07:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 71F285DE0A; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:07:01 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from celox-ma1-ems1.celoxnetworks.com (celox-ma1-imap1.celoxnetworks.com [12.40.60.233]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0B25DE04 for <idr@merit.edu>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:07:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by celox-ma1-ems1.celoxnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <RBC12XZP>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:07:00 -0400
Message-ID: <1117F7D44159934FB116E36F4ABF221B020AFB32@celox-ma1-ems1.celoxnetworks.com>
From: "Natale, Jonathan" <JNatale@celoxnetworks.com>
To: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@nexthop.com>, curtis@fictitious.org
Cc: idr@merit.edu
Subject: New Issue AS path
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 17:06:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
What about the fact that an AS_SET counts as 1 (in IOS)??? Is that already in the spec? Does juniper set AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE to 0 too? What about AS_CONFED_SETs? Does anybody use these? I don't think we want to put stuff in [to the draft] just because IOS does it; it might be nice to put stuff in that covers Juniper and IOS, if and only if it affect interoperability. -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jhaas@nexthop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:28 PM To: curtis@fictitious.org Cc: idr@merit.edu Subject: Re: issue 11 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:22:02PM -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > It would be useful to add this to the RR RFC. That would be my preferred action. However, I would also prefer that the AS_PATH length calculation for confederation segments (i.e. they have zero value) also be moved into the confed update. > Curtis -- Jeff Haas NextHop Technologies
- New Issue AS path Natale, Jonathan
- Re: New Issue AS path Jeffrey Haas
- Re: New Issue AS path Curtis Villamizar
- RE: New Issue AS path Natale, Jonathan
- Re: New Issue AS path Mathew Richardson
- RE: New Issue AS path Natale, Jonathan
- RE: New Issue AS path Natale, Jonathan