Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-06 - Question for authors

Wei Wang <weiwang94@foxmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2024 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <weiwang94@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B109C14F684 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.08
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAyUsvt1Mnhp for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-221-210.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-210.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7031C14F682 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1711072975; bh=B0PO8r+eyXl4z8PLzQvCJNt8JqXiduobofVAmzqqD2A=; h=In-Reply-To:References:From:To:Subject:Date; b=S8pym97ADfq1g6A1uiHhbHNaBVF/2BeXWbyeVoXstXs4fW8SossZ9f6B360xGkKQT M+alFdMhEueATQooa/UaTxEvP/MtueRpm4FwY8ciIVuaDXrM/uBXKWi49zac7G61Bb DbQVvqQMcioser9OC2TA/e9Ck+ZGNuYC1Jzarc/Q=
X-QQ-FEAT: oHWrrGTW1dCGJEu1CuC8+nIWkvSYK6n9
X-QQ-SSF: 00000000000000F0000000000000
X-QQ-XMRINFO: NI4Ajvh11aEj8Xl/2s1/T8w=
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NkQGnmzToUyFNzcg2rM/0UbzJ/Zmd/XXQ1DJyVE70+w3xXH6jn40SaHIkB/u9V E7yPIOkg0ZdX+waH5wobswW2PTZyPbYNpYdfttVuFpQ/YIl55iqwZ0doShgd+hKHfeHmj0uskkS5K njY4iy+2PJCN4uqBYg1UX+iXrj9KXKtrhk/6QrPWZNzpRexdqwPGkOUOVo4avl6wNMMF+ZAdcQR2R TdJXgUwiug6DStl6lPGQPrmJEWroh+XTynLybwxmUAdCWIzFVXb16SHDqDZXZTX42eFm/ma6lr/IO 9TBV2V4Tk5QZCA6RNH8mDi3keC1I1Odmz/s43OCiwLfRjDAj7+N3gRnxs3lALQnq5qNAppStOEcQt 8ni9emNrMet6jl8Q+nQLOWiBoaBBkgag+9a5j5h3hr9w8nv5C+/TkfEoI5l1fk3PK9oFWCp6sma9r 73ZeRZ7fdJZA98nWw3LsF6vC0nFoBcbTIsavBY10zvfzk9v0YrziAOqy0MWJ6nmdPjvye9xxSUTyX KKD89/iaAb5l3pP2UFxcX0GrVldX3ZOTZxpvB5TJnO9WGvYNwXvvaiEwbZzCYYIw5ZT70cNa59E8o FlAiT3yFHvfIq/jgY2m9ZlgEBWva8qQEhi2ceLRMDjuUT3wdNwUZaupyUWxovX1PghygJtMi8gFaa N/PwuguEW0AuChXJ0LyRPsTLSyUWSRpzz4Kp7O3dghkFG7MXge7ngTF0UL36e4pWsbutpnU6zfd+h s0tWmIUjUqMbCns0rl6cbXWT5h4muGoD71iuuVBGD9psJ5s+mYOnuzJSrPQhgdnz3EpwGcDhflRep fpWKWqJ/0GOZyl4VcAg+JOgH3JuvRZa0fJ5bDl44u+zRAYoiJ4Ho6F3CTh0tuttKv4wdLjC0RZZss S62W0FYDDCze2vWt+eLHCRL0k/DRU17NLpVAQQrhbj+SJDeOXKOq/QXKmcR+gouqnC75cQAqU0jMJ lvM9dXkP2EFKICVVCBhN2vjl6zcuY6F5U9K2MW6g==
X-HAS-ATTACH: no
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-Originating-IP: 31.133.167.237
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR08MB4857CF9B16313B005E273EC2B3322@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM6PR08MB4857CF9B16313B005E273EC2B3322@DM6PR08MB4857.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: webmail865t1711072975t5416893
From: Wei Wang <weiwang94@foxmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_65FCE6CF_10DB59C0_0CE02F7B"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:02:55 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_0853F3C86C8B9969512F6D40ED907A927308@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Z2ZcAiVpZciRc2gMAFFzv7tg1fA>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-06 - Question for authors
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 02:03:10 -0000

Hi Sue,


&nbsp; &nbsp; Thanks for your comments! The implementation from H3C has realize the packet changes. And the implementation based on open-source BGP implementation can realize the trigger of VPN Prefix ORF mechanism in intra-domain and inter-domain scenarios.
&nbsp; &nbsp; The main content of this draft will not be changed unless we received comments on the technical points, so we think its content is stable and ready for WGLC.


Best Regards,

&nbsp;Wei
------------------&nbsp;Original&nbsp;------------------
From:                                                                                                                        "Susan Hares"                                                                                    <shares@ndzh.com&gt;;
Date:&nbsp;Fri, Mar 22, 2024 07:18 AM
To:&nbsp;"idr@ietf.org"<idr@ietf.org&gt;;

Subject:&nbsp;[Idr] draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-06 - Question for authors



  
Greetings Wei, Aijun, Haibo, Gyan, Shunwan, and Jie: 
 
&nbsp;
 
I’m happy to see the progress you have made on your draft.&nbsp; I noticed that you have two implementations of draft-ietf-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-06 (H3C and Freertr). 
 
&nbsp;
 
Has the current set of packet changes been added to these two implementations?&nbsp; Are you ready for WG LC? 
 
&nbsp;
 
If you are heading toward WG LC, please remember that only 5 authors can be on the front page. &nbsp; You can elect 2 editors and put the remainder of the authors in a section at the back. 
 
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;
 
Cheerily, Sue