Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25.txt

Hi,

I just uploaded a revision of the draft that contains the changes from the latest IANA and IESG reviews, and IDR poll:

*) Changed the SHOULD / MUST constructs to MUST / MUST (this was the conclusion of the poll on that question)

*) Changed the section in the IANA considerations regarding the YANG iana-routing-types: request IANA to also change the names of the ENUMS.

Cheers

Christoph

--
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at

> On 21.05.2020, at 08:49, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules
>        Authors         : Christoph Loibl
>                          Susan Hares
>                          Robert Raszuk
>                          Danny McPherson
>                          Martin Bacher
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25.txt
> 	Pages           : 39
> 	Date            : 2020-05-20
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines a Border Gateway Protocol Network Layer
>   Reachability Information (BGP NLRI) encoding format that can be used
>   to distribute traffic Flow Specifications.  This allows the routing
>   system to propagate information regarding more specific components of
>   the traffic aggregate defined by an IP destination prefix.
> 
>   It also specifies BGP Extended Community encoding formats, that can
>   be used to propagate Traffic Filtering Actions along with the Flow
>   Specification NLRI.  Those Traffic Filtering Actions encode actions a
>   routing system can take if the packet matches the Flow Specification.
> 
>   Additionally, it defines two applications of that encoding format:
>   one that can be used to automate inter-domain coordination of traffic
>   filtering, such as what is required in order to mitigate
>   (distributed) denial-of-service attacks, and a second application to
>   provide traffic filtering in the context of a BGP/MPLS VPN service.
>   Other applications (e.g. centralized control of traffic in a SDN or
>   NFV context) are also possible.  Other documents may specify Flow
>   Specification extensions.
> 
>   The information is carried via BGP, thereby reusing protocol
>   algorithms, operational experience, and administrative processes such
>   as inter-provider peering agreements.
> 
>   This document obsoletes both RFC5575 and RFC7674.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25.txt

Attachment: signature.asc