[Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-22.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri, 15 January 2021 08:58 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9CF3A10E4; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:58:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: idr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <161070108492.26390.2445713377934404067@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:58:04 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_VMCDvNvi35Vo65UAlvSXD16Ciw>
Subject: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-22.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:58:05 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : BGP Optimal Route Reflection (BGP-ORR)
Authors : Robert Raszuk
Christian Cassar
Erik Aman
Bruno Decraene
Kevin Wang
Filename : draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-22.txt
Pages : 14
Date : 2021-01-15
Abstract:
This document defines an extension to BGP route reflectors. On route
reflectors, BGP route selection is modified in order to choose the
best path from the standpoint of their clients, rather than from the
standpoint of the route reflectors. Multiple types of granularity
are proposed, from a per client BGP route selection or to a per peer
group, depending on the scaling and precision requirements on route
selection. This solution is particularly applicable in deployments
using centralized route reflectors, where choosing the best route
based on the route reflector IGP location is suboptimal. This
facilitates, for example, best exit point policy (hot potato
routing).
The solution relies upon all route reflectors learning all paths
which are eligible for consideration. Best path selection is
performed in each route reflector based on the IGP cost from a
selected location in the link state IGP.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection/
There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-22
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-22
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-22
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-rout… internet-drafts
- Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-… bruno.decraene