[Idr] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14

Magnus Nystrom via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 18 May 2021 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E3F3A1AD2; Mon, 17 May 2021 20:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Nystrom via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid.all@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <162130739076.21940.5228836987347937240@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Magnus Nystrom <magnusn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:09:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_Y9qpzyBvRucXVQsYr686IUmjM4>
Subject: [Idr] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 03:09:51 -0000

Reviewer: Magnus Nystrom
Review result: Has Nits

I was asked to re-review -14 after my review of -13. I'd like to thank the
authors for making updates based on my review of -13. The only additional
suggestion I have is to ad a clarifying statement after the sentence "If the
condition of the peer is unknown, the rule SHOULD not be enforced" along the
lines of "As mentioned above, this does represent a security risk."