Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension-01 (6/14/2017 to 6/28/2017)

Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 June 2017 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC544128CDB; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93BS1sOjy9kR; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E495A127868; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e142so21133319ywa.1; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O8dAhajxjmc4NWTehP1Z+5mYlaUVat+fGf1pCDZxot0=; b=iWRg6vz4/U4SzvUvOXpq++Mo3edfGYd7KAOUm3nP7iYnJdvO8pNtWKsLzczj70J6nb HkRZkX5zirdkKioTHhESpCLqftlqwA5jOj+6bNK3Tb44u96wLT6TdRf/DGy1eoBgyvRu 3+Y1dt+mynFl5azd43nTPv3Xfpn9XVMeIKsikNX9V3WPtsLlm/487e7QmgU8ftLC6ZZ1 4sw85KZyU05AFqxHvLzss1y/Uh+B7i429QXAHrYz4ANw5Xp7uylU6925fdJmsdZ9R9I0 wLd0LbiM2mfamdx7yeKkkVMaHnvPGMFnR7YZEFt68z9kLzb0zA+wgRLEt758HgW7RxcY Yb1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O8dAhajxjmc4NWTehP1Z+5mYlaUVat+fGf1pCDZxot0=; b=rN9JDCyL5k7J1VAGX5bNEgt8rmPrAvduli2er+9jpDHKWJOgBaswK/oYEu3o2UeaEM Sg39C1L9qfDhszTaOThGaeOEUHMZWreIj1f31W4avcJSTbveRhZg7U1CG3MmgUtnorv/ DYSLlPJvlKSjGLQu5RYDNrfBD6D9exLgqC3k/qfVWfRX70iUyBtXrHRs5iJHPNjwmeiG a+I3N27lAZO9IBJ7NkGpO2ii3+DkBCUQGeJeqoaHXvY4+saV51mWZ/GqKEN5W5G0TWVN eU456/FKPvmZJkX20PCCFSGSLfL31ip4gOyd+MRCX4LdY8+sjID0mZ3q6o+e+MHRjLZD +daw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxbNzp05hKbkDPtyMDwMGmRZa2gf4GlpDMqsoyHPoD0e3HFuapm uKt9N4fv2cxnv8uoeNJoNQ6hued1bg==
X-Received: by 10.129.49.151 with SMTP id x145mr9955582ywx.0.1497627423087; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.83.31.6 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00d701d2e559$600b0270$20210750$@ndzh.com>
References: <00d701d2e559$600b0270$20210750$@ndzh.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:07:02 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEFuwkg95wLK8S0yQLqDdrLde1O=csObhbqNBRqA_ZhdwOLN4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, idr-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142222c8f242a0552158e89"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/aG-PQNIRwprOSsh5rKfV70cOyfQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension-01 (6/14/2017 to 6/28/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:37:07 -0000

Hi Chairs,

Please find some answers inline..

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-bgp-ls-node-admin-tag-extension
> (6/14/2017 to 6/28/2017).   The WG should be aware that this draft has IPR
> associated with it.  In your responses regarding this WG LC, please
> indicate if you are concerned about the IPR.
>
>
>
> The chairs would appreciate if the operators would indicate whether they
> would deploy this draft.
>
>
>
> The authors should within the first 5 days do the following:
>
> 1)      Send a statement to the WG indicating whether you know of any
> additional IPR,
>
[Pushpasis] I am not aware of any IPR other than the one already disclosed

> 2)      Please respond to the IDR list questions on a daily basis
>
[Pushpasis] Sure, will be glad to do so.

> 3)      Submit a implementation reports to the IDR wiki under the
> location
>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-
> ls-node-admin-tag-extension-01
>
[Pushpasis] Honestly, I don't know about any implementation(s) of this
draft myself. But this draft carries the same node-admin tags in BGP-LS as
distributed by IGPs as specified in RFC 7917 (ISIS Node admin tags) and RFC
7777 (OSPF Node admin tags), and I doubt that there is an implementation of
these IGP RFCs yet (I may be wrong though). So I would like to ask the WG
if implementation report is still an absolute MUST for WGLC or not.

Thanks and regards
-Pushpasis

>
>
> The IDR WG will do a WG LC on a draft, but it will not forward this draft
> to the IESG without 2 working implementations.   If the these actions are
> not taken within 5 days, will extend the WG LC by 1 week while we wait for
> this information.
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Sue Hares and John Scudder (co-Chairs)
>
> Jie Dong (WG secretary)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>