IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC on changes to draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04.txt (4/20 to 5/4/2015) - extended to 5/18/2015

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 06 May 2015 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9CE1B2A50 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2015 18:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wshJ-I48Gb0e for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2015 18:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D891B2AD2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2015 18:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 588CB1E301; Wed, 6 May 2015 01:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 21:20:28 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150506012028.GA26596@pfrc.org>
References: <009101d08799$91662180$b4326480$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <009101d08799$91662180$b4326480$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bPREWwwLZq8-asm6-TQgX42u4uo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC on changes to draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04.txt (4/20 to 5/4/2015) - extended to 5/18/2015
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 01:21:56 -0000

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:11:22PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> The IDR mail list has received no comments on the the revision of the
> draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04.txt.   Due to earlier support for
> this draft, this call is extended to 5/18/2015.   Unless this draft receives
> support comments, this draft will not be forwarded to the IESG. 

To reiterate, all that is require is for some bodies to agree that the code
point registration policy is okay.

Come on, support it.  You know you want to...

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email