IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Support for damping (Issue #26)

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51CF12083F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twW7so7X8vH2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 117E31201E3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id j5so21606596ioj.8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=tpLLLMe3FX5Qa0auaPqxM0ElNU6DtE+Q6st6326QD9Y=; b=q3cvYyML5AKliEAQ9P/23QkaGYTq9fjzCY8SSq5QzJcPzWO5o718oOBLL/a8XXNnXJ QTPO+FWV4o9oymtzltXZernWPx+1jBovTQuGwxnZgYFrEkXrTJ1Ts0SF3vKcMB6AsPcU szNt0/0GkWxPb6b52e0SMQDdxGeAYh5gDVxBgbxdVCwnlFNhJOX19FGaqm37H8J7j2Ed M9me7ud1Cl5nKj5YSe3IyA8NO3TOf+F4sG1V8g36HHkHVYJBX7MHSge+ljINZN+2qTpe OejeaN2Gi9gDR+w8JoEzVEoOl9KjhIBsEiSnkH/CfxvJyiSA9Zq48cDUoxeZTMm89JMQ Awtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=tpLLLMe3FX5Qa0auaPqxM0ElNU6DtE+Q6st6326QD9Y=; b=TsllK0p1MgYi6ePnJZlLCh5dIXBJUBmDCakcVn+hK1dR3VxxkfzQneorq50xfl6hB8 3w27apZW+mibxN0kO1ftfFruS/fN6Gj34w7W7Ur7eoa0wosG8KVlSfFSlGHBd4xM45Ue XgVAd5a/0EWUw4i6qw6X+Hif84zXTsBllKJuq7UzPjcSl/q/EyEXWMbPV9zTPlfgRgWU kuc5WFaCea4aUpCOrGF0w9YjaZDzkPOwlDvsB815ktg4hVxrCb7HJ7tdSlmyN0RvrIUk NEWYueQP+10bECudlm5obiAQJUF2g1OFZo9XIdjDidjJodx6Lch9rvsmnh91mD0V2h1z izlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVU7ZQx31l5BNoznIy6WD2Qbl4aqmvaBdHPnPLnaGUeak/pSJ5E zm5/Hv7zz4fX7XFFmcWVOE/MVmvf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxintswPd4iOVREWdS76l190teoOnxqzC4S5Xrhan3aIELqrbzVr3tN025hwkXuOUE3KzE+9Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:640c:: with SMTP id t12mr7447023iog.123.1566579670178; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.122] (c-73-93-49-153.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.49.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm3876765iod.17.2019.08.23.10.01.09 for <idr@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6F24F271-2AB8-4BA5-B9AA-7EEA71D1E451"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:01:07 -0700
References: <6092FE2F-1225-4CE9-BDD2-AB943B7275DE@gmail.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6092FE2F-1225-4CE9-BDD2-AB943B7275DE@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <21048216-47F5-4B95-BE74-B88E0B3D2D93@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/c_9inNH_eq2KZJ4c7qYP2kbHYJM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Support for damping (Issue #26)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:01:13 -0000

Since I did not get any feedback on the question of damping, I have gone ahead and added support for damping using the semantics described for GateD.

Cheers.

> On Aug 7, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> One of the issues that has been opened against the BGP YANG model is the support for damping. It is documented here <https://github.com/mjethanandani/ietf-bgp-yang/issues/26>.
> 
> As it stands, all that the model supports is the notion of disabling/enabling damping. But many more parameters are needed to support damping, and there seems to be no commonality between how different vendors have chosen to support damping. 
> 
> The question to the WG therefore is, what form of damping would the WG like to see supported. The version in gated, or the one in Cisco IOS-XR, or Cisco IOS-XE, or Juniper, or Ericsson, etc.
> 
> Thanks.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email