IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] comments on draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 01 August 2017 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C1C1322F2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7LJTqqY759lC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710D71322E3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94209435B6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 21:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29EA4512B; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 20:47:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id CF9C3237C7; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 20:47:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 20:47:36 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170801184736.GL45648@Space.Net>
References: <59807D1E.4050807@foobar.org> <20170801133109.fdupuhfooudham5d@hanna.meerval.net> <CA+b+ERmoKAoLr_6yAHSyqJKBGANHxVJMF8am0UQqoDhid_+ziw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmoKAoLr_6yAHSyqJKBGANHxVJMF8am0UQqoDhid_+ziw@mail.gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/d0yOaOL3Gk7Ss3H5YW5LEg-CezY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] comments on draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 19:13:24 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:50:27PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Not quite ... Nick is correct - next hop reachability are global in RS.

This would be a possible but fairly silly implementation choice.

The whole point is that reachability issues on a too-large fabric are
not universal - otherwise, the RS would lose reachability to the client
in question as well, and the whole point would be moot.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email