IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] [IANA #1270258] RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-13.txt

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Thu, 13 April 2023 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DFCC15DD6A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13DUMFxd3M9s for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (mail-m121145.qiye.163.com [115.236.121.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBC1C15270E for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 697F7800099; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:26:56 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Ketan Talaulikar' <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>, iana-issues@iana.org
Cc: idr@ietf.org
References: <RT-Ticket-1270258@icann.org> <168057878631.5637.2603228241949528770@ietfa.amsl.com> <006e01d966a7$4bffd7d0$e3ff8770$@tsinghua.org.cn> <rt-5.0.3-3707785-1681260344-1309.1270258-37-0@icann.org> <CAH6gdPy6yNVpuj+ZrhQ+O2XqtpFFHt1KsQ=VuV6hPawC_+RdEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6gdPy6yNVpuj+ZrhQ+O2XqtpFFHt1KsQ=VuV6hPawC_+RdEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:26:55 +0800
Message-ID: <004c01d96dea$172a4000$457ec000$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004D_01D96E2D.254DF530"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJUA7SHzvifvfwL5BSsxgKRE1LzDwIflR9JAS0/Fr4CaMHfFgGJ1J+RrfnPxxA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkaHkoeVklNSklMQ01CQ00dTlUTARMWGhIXJB QOD1lXWRgSC1lBWUlKQlVKT0lVTUJVTE5ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZT0tIVUpKS0hKQ1VKS0tVS1kG
X-HM-Tid: 0a8779f07d16b03akuuu697f7800099
X-HM-MType: 1
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6MRQ6ORw5Az0NNCxKDSg2OU84 GTQaCjlVSlVKTUNKSExDS0pMS09MVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUpJT0hNNwY+
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/d1o2jiHHYIYa1VhzYln1axa4b3Y>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [IANA #1270258] RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-13.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:27:04 -0000

Hi, Amanda and Ketan:

 

Thanks for your responses.

If the temporary allocation is not available, we will wait for the later expert reviews and the permanent allocation later.

We will first put forward the adoption of LSR draft then.

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:40 PM
To: iana-issues@iana.org
Cc: wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn; idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] [IANA #1270258] RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-13.txt

 

Hi Aijun,

 

Since the referenced LSR document has not yet been adopted by the LSR WG, it is only prudent for us to hold off allocating code-points for its corresponding BGP-LS extensions.

 

My 2c

 

Thanks,

Ketan

 

 

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:16 AM Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org <mailto:iana-issues@iana.org> > wrote:

Hi Aijun,

> We updated the draft, which are mainly aligned with the contents within
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-06
> for Native IP scenario.
> Two additional new TLVs are defined, they are  "Stub Link IPv4 Prefix" and
> "Stub Link IPv6 Prefix" respectively.
> 
> We also give some suggestions for the IANA allocated values of newly
> proposed values, expect the IANA can assign them temporarily for the
> implementations.
> Comments are welcome.

For IANA, is this is a request to review the revised IANA Considerations section (which looks good, except that recently-approved draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-16 changed the name of the "BGP-LS Node Descriptor, Link Descriptor, Prefix Descriptor, and Attribute TLVs" registry mentioned in Section 10.2 to "BGP-LS NLRI and Attribute TLVs") or to ask the experts to approve assignments now? 

We can send registration requests to the experts, but because those registries' registration procedures have been changed to "Expert Review," temporary allocation is no longer possible. Any allocations would be permanent.

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email