IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Last Call for BGP ORF and Prefix-ORF drafts

Neil Matthew <neil@abelon.com> Mon, 26 June 2006 08:03 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fum44-0002Pk-O4; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 04:03:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fum44-0002Pf-5S for idr@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 04:03:24 -0400
Received: from mail03.powweb.com ([66.152.97.36]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fum42-0006o3-ST for idr@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 04:03:24 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (host81-129-66-3.range81-129.btcentralplus.com [81.129.66.3]) by mail03.powweb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3B014D866 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 01:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <449F94CB.9060109@abelon.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:03:23 +0100
From: Neil Matthew <neil@abelon.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call for BGP ORF and Prefix-ORF drafts
References: <200606142107.k5EL79572946@merlot.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <200606142107.k5EL79572946@merlot.juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Folks

Just one question on the route filter draft.  The section on Community 
and Extended Community ORF types has been removed.  I can see that this 
makes for a more generic document but are these ORF types to be 
described in a separate document and does their removal at this stage 
alter their behaviour?

Cheers

Neil

Yakov Rekhter wrote:

>Folks,
>
>This is to start IDR WG Last Call on advancing the following documents
>to Proposed Standard:
>
>   draft-ietf-idr-route-filter-14.txt
>   draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-orf-03.txt
>
>Implementation report is draft-chen-bgp-orf-survey-00.txt.
>
>The Last Call ends Jun 28, 2006.
>
>Yakov.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email