IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-25: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 21 June 2018 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C073D130FF9; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVa1_MRI-v7s; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91918130E52; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4682; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1529548059; x=1530757659; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=c44oM6+nW2CugILl3YOHWL9omRwjIPb46EPhb7MnTu8=; b=GN9W8uLtRyfB0rxI0o82Qh+bZIOUWC6CPayR3B48hG4ujVzm1fRtCxoP koUx9L7jEYjE9vDk3Lrp6qqrIYRHox9M/W3ANu4eiWCkDZTpGMpfJYZ6k OjPk63LHrKuZaJqDC7PoVTYPOiY1Vb7/FeZw+C9OAdfO+RXcHY1Bsl9/Y g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DGAAC6DCtb/5NdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNJgWEoCoNviASMPoICj32FA4F5C4RsAheCYCE0GAECAQEBAQEBAm0ohSkBBAEjVgULAgEIBDsDAgICMBQRAgQOBYMlgRxcCKsughyIRm2IVIITgQ8kgmiHezGCJAKZJAkCjw6BP4QBiAGROAIREwGBJB04gVJwFWUBgjyCIRcRjgZvjkuBGgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,249,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="131932887"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2018 02:27:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5L2RcqT011454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 02:27:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:27:37 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:27:37 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
CC: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, "draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-25: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUB2S6oc4ozvoVuUCAKGrO7tZtWKRn6SeAgAI6fICAAB93AA==
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 02:27:37 +0000
Message-ID: <3D971B71-25FA-45A9-8EA3-D97B5669AE57@cisco.com>
References: <152936822718.2775.3314466707851170074.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FC8E0115-BBED-4ACC-9946-312777BE3E11@cisco.com> <CACWOCC-4kG3YJZauapnvHYMM_93xd=Pt2EqzTwdAbOU+t73aXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC-4kG3YJZauapnvHYMM_93xd=Pt2EqzTwdAbOU+t73aXA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3D971B7125FA45A98EA3D97B5669AE57ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/dIvfXYB_XQh99r-TAl0JKYovuNY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 02:27:42 -0000


On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:34 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net<mailto:job@ntt.net>> wrote:

> Thank you for including this -- however, as I'm sure you know, the state of BGP
> filtering in the wild is, er, poor. Can you please provide some additional
> guidance? For example, could you include an appendix with examples?

No. As I told you before this is a can of worms that I’m not going to open in this draft (and particularly not during IESG review). As I also told you before the state of BGP filtering is something that you should propose as a work item for your OPS homies in the GROW WG.


BTW - these “OPS homies” would love to see more RFC 8212 implementations! :-)

Indeed, somehow I didn’t even have to look this RFC up ;^) I still think that a vendor-neutral draft on filtering use cases would be a worthwhile GROW endeavor.

Thanks,
Acee



Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email