Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3345 (3787)

[Danny McPherson <[e-mail]>]

I confirm (“verify”) that the error reported below is appropriate.  There is indeed no AS2 in the figure and it should have indicated AS10, as illustrated in the subsequent table.

Thanks, 

-danny


On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:08 PM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3345,
> "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Persistent Route Oscillation Condition".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3345&eid=3787
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Ramakrishna DTV <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 2.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      1) Ra has the following installed in its BGP table, with the path
>         learned via AS2 marked best:
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      1) Ra has the following installed in its BGP table, with the path
>         learned via AS10 marked best:
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The above text is related to a discussion of topology depicted in Figure 1. This figure does not have AS2 at all. The text should refer to AS10 instead.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3345 (draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-01)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Persistent Route Oscillation Condition
> Publication Date    : August 2002
> Author(s)           : D. McPherson, V. Gill, D. Walton, A. Retana
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>