IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-mrai-dep-03

Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org> Tue, 29 March 2011 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@jakma.org>
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7899A3A6A27 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnlvtkKOqNlS for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hibernia.jakma.org (hibernia.jakma.org [212.17.55.49]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B623A690F for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jamaica.dcs.gla.ac.uk (jamaica.dcs.gla.ac.uk [130.209.244.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hibernia.jakma.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2TDmTT7011741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:48:34 +0100
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:48:24 +0100
From: Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>
X-X-Sender: paul@jamaica.dcs.gla.ac.uk
To: bruno.decraene@orange-ftgroup.com
In-Reply-To: <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC240020E57C5@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1103291441390.13073@jamaica.dcs.gla.ac.uk>
References: <5C153416-1444-48AA-A940-7AFB4ADEEB2A@juniper.net> <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC240020E57C5@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
Mail-Copies-To: paul@jakma.org
X-NSA: al aqsar fluffy jihad cute musharef kittens jet-A1 ear avgas wax ammonium bad qran dog inshallah allah al-akbar martyr iraq hammas hisballah rabin ayatollah korea revolt pelvix mustard gas x-ray british airways washington peroxide cool
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-mrai-dep-03
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:47:27 -0000

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, bruno.decraene@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:

> Sorry if I'm missing something obvious or already discussed but is 
> there a need to recommend that an AS (SP/ISP) use (hence configure) 
> the same MRAI value for all its IBGP sessions? Also, RFC 4271 made 
> a distinction between iBGP and eBGP sessions (basically MRAI value 
> on iBGP should be lower than on eBGP). Does this need to be added 
> or is this also deprecated?

That's out of scope. Implementations may or may not wish to do that. 
An earlier form of this draft (draft-jakma-mrai-02) gave more of an 
outline, but it doesn't seem there is a consensus on anything more 
specific than that the current RFC4271 defaults are not appropriate.

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma  paul@jakma.org  twitter: @pjakma  PGP: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
*** Rince is wagner@schizo.DAINet.de (We have Joey, we have Fun, we have Linux on a Sun)
 	-- Seen on #Debian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email