[Idr] Please review draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment, comments are welcome!

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com> Thu, 27 June 2019 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <chengli13@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967A412025D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFtJREvYryC9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 031CF120111 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5B9E1A22B772C6D0152B for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:57:44 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:57:43 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by dggeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:57:00 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Please review draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment, comments are welcome!
Thread-Index: AdUsvcktuVaf8LGuR92Old8PEI/nxw==
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:57:00 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB0262B49C@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB0262B49Cdggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hK4BZzVOY2zwnPXHfL7xkd0ovuw>
Subject: [Idr] Please review draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment, comments are welcome!
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:57:49 -0000

Hi WG,

We have updated our draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment, welcome to review! Comments are always welcome!

Thanks to Shraddha's comments again! Main modifications are:

* add IANA text
* address comments from Shraddha
* update refs


From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chengli (Cheng Li)
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 11:49 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>; Shraddha Hegde <shraddha=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment

Hi Shraddha,

Sorry for my delay, I agree with your comments, will update to address them in the next revision.


From: Shraddha Hegde [mailto:shraddha@juniper..net]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:20 PM
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:shraddha=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>; draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org<mailto:draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment


Any update on these comments?


From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:01 PM
To: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org<mailto:draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org>
Cc: idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment


Some comments on the draft.

1.       Section 3.1 SR Path Segment
“Also, it can be used for identifying an SR candidate path or an SR
   Policy defined in [I-D..ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dli-2Didr-2Dbgp-2Dls-2Dsr-2Dpolicy-2Dpath-2Dsegment-2D01&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=NyjLsr7JA7mvpCJa0YmPdVKcmMXJ31bpbBaNqzCNrng&m=fhDBtbOJt9FNZe9QgtQaQqUrpMmmysNkjcxgoViXQFE&s=-1GDP7HACe3TkVsevxfmZGEU2Zz4YhUtZh5r7Zcwsm0&e=>].”

When the path-segment is used for identifying SR policy/candidate path,
The SR Path Segment sub-TLV should appear in the SR policy as below. Pls update figure 1.

SR Policy SAFI NLRI: <Distinguisher, Policy-Color, Endpoint>
           Attributes: Tunnel Encaps Attribute (23)
           Tunnel Type: SR Policy
               Binding SID
               Policy Name
               Explicit NULL Label Policy (ENLP)
               Path Segment
               Bidirectioanl Path
                   Segment List

The Path Segment Sub-TLV may be associated with SR Policy as well as the Segment List
Simultaneously, or may be associated with SR-Policy or segment List alone based on usecases.
2.       I suggest to update the IANA section, with code points and NLRIs/attributes where the TLVs/sub-TLVs appear in BGP-LS NLRI
Along with the code-points. It’s useful for implementors as well as IANA to keep the registry up to date.