Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9552 (7789)

Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 31 January 2024 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8281CC18DBBC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:29:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xhzum_hvoVEq for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F6DC14F5EA for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a26ed1e05c7so635562966b.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:29:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706700584; x=1707305384; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YR4i8GhxduWIf19aevHMu6VtZyKpvAN12hY7vZq/xGE=; b=Pv25xkOGytWK5BcRmawgBRP815QdcD7mbskVTDPzPbf1R4mwWO5gjqHtk7rKTWQxFN +4yZQD1r5d/vbsHiOnZeiPWVqS5i4ATTE04qfh/KxdpG9Avl8HOnZavATszjWYbxvq6j 9mQD+8YDtYeIOV4nFXhwYHYD+L0F8oCDs/RtDoD9sUTF6mzwjhFMSHrWYE5DfcjEJE25 oPz4LkP78itWTA0DypszmtH+GNhzI54sfc6v1FsArg0SbgLVGTI6Ritb/NkF6jHCKRvY AXu7FpDrA6RyVUg+KpU26aE6VyonWA/bOPiJ8lWAQ8HvDCGfrG2U4vB4Fev9oca7qAoq fFFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706700584; x=1707305384; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YR4i8GhxduWIf19aevHMu6VtZyKpvAN12hY7vZq/xGE=; b=t/3N2NGpjWD7O4Jmc53vVXpaypj60VHXKne4Fj+rGiBxXUpu9BpU+406eNTNYpOfbl evvu/C/hSB1m8K/xN96ljUAwxiQXyl46J0LccNHfAbfEyxoSAKLN1wMcrdT8sg+GRGsd b+gjoEl63XZ+m7NntNBPDNHx+E6OvqR//wAoFSL9gZuaHAHiZYIoPfLnzv30iqS7VEUR ZdPVblVemP8DxhZIs73PKxd4HRj6gEOWo98hpSevwzI6vy/d9A8WrPrPW2UG+4J8YRck Subi9UL4mm6V5+683bgT0+ncrCN1h8hEC3ddhcIcfVEa3mhM1kbLsN7mlsS8ZCU7Hrh0 s6YQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzoKtDwoHPZ1hzYvm6Er5qrE+iuj7xYVOPvGU1M+h9MkAYet8/s UAZWUVItu3BeFLJUBzLBGDMteSizqXODyJ0ZvT5VrLNFB0vGKZLOodXdBKu6FaV4d1XlJAJycIy 1WplcnPwoX269+nOClD2YooaiW14=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF1BwMbP/QW2hUl9n+DKeUw2BsVouy8X4US63wLnHm5057LRw+TSMsVqtmEAcMgUUUF9DzADvYpoyX2zOEObNM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1ccb:b0:a31:61ac:be1c with SMTP id i11-20020a1709061ccb00b00a3161acbe1cmr874136ejh.63.1706700583680; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:29:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240130084108.0466C1E646@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240130084108.0466C1E646@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:59:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPwfmj4RV=d_O=PsAhpRK9iUdawT3U6zzzzU-v4tE56hMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: daominhlong98@gmail.com, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000073c8a06103c3244"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/hVGJjF_pDyhsLz2udJFw2mfF2Kc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9552 (7789)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:29:49 -0000

Hello,

This editorial errata should be verified since the "T" flag in Figure 15 is
called "A" flag both in the text in Section 5.3.1.1 as well as Table 14 in
IANA considerations section 7.1.4 (as well as the IANA registry).

Thanks,
Ketan


On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:11 PM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9552,
> "Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7789
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Long Dao <daominhlong98@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 5.3.1.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |              Type             |             Length            |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |O|T|E|B|R|V|   |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |              Type             |             Length            |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |O|A|E|B|R|V|   |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> Notes
> -----
> "T" flag should be changed to "A" to match the description below
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9552 (draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-17)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering
> Information Using BGP
> Publication Date    : December 2023
> Author(s)           : K. Talaulikar, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>