[Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-02.txt (10/4/2018 to 10/18/2018)

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Mon, 08 October 2018 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CC8130E28; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPx68FSlVuIL; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F059130E1E; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id ED4B01FC7D4B5; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:34:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:34:29 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:34:24 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext@ietf.org" <draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-02.txt (10/4/2018 to 10/18/2018)
Thread-Index: AdRcHk64oDwWdL5oS7q3owhEVwCYaAC8O2dQ
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:34:24 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927A7A03369@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <009b01d45c1e$9d9d4110$d8d7c330$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <009b01d45c1e$9d9d4110$d8d7c330$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.56.82]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927A7A03369NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/i18KreUflcy6Ru7TeuNyCvURja0>
Subject: [Idr] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFdHIEFkb3B0aW9uIGNhbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0?= =?gb2312?b?LXdhbmctaWRyLWJncGxzLWludGVyLWFzLXRvcG9sb2d5LWV4dC0wMi50eHQg?= =?gb2312?b?KDEwLzQvMjAxOCB0byAxMC8xOC8yMDE4KQ==?=
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 14:34:36 -0000

Hi,

This document describes valid use cases of building inter-domain topology using  BGP-LS. Thus I support the adoption.

And a few comment about section 4:

The Link NLRI of BGP-LS includes the local node descriptors and remote node descriptors, in which the AS number TLV can be carried. Can this be used to specify the remote AS information? If so, the new remote AS number TLV may not be necessary.

Please clarify whether the remote ASBR-ID is similar to one of the following TLVs:

a.       BGP router-ID as defined in draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe,

b.       IGP router-ID as defined in node descriptor sub-TLVs in RFC 7752,

c.       IPv4/IPv6 Router-ID as defined in Link attribute TLVs of RFC 7752.

It would be good if some existing TLVs can be reused to fulfill the use cases described.

Best regards,
Jie

发件人: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Susan Hares
发送时间: 2018年10月5日 4:13
收件人: idr@ietf.org
抄送: draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext@ietf.org
主题: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-02.txt (10/4/2018 to 10/18/2018)

Greetings:

This is a WG adoption call for draft-want-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-02.txt (10/4/2018 to 10/18/2018).  A quick link to the draft is at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext/

Please comment on whether you feel this addition to the BGP-LS set of drafts will help operational management of networks.

Susan Hares
IDR co-chair