IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-25.txt

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 26 May 2018 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A3712D7F7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 22:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8XcdgTErwqcf for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 May 2018 22:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73433120721 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 May 2018 22:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1fMRsk-0003ZB-JG; Sat, 26 May 2018 05:36:46 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 22:36:46 -0700
Message-ID: <m2k1rrt1u9.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1401F133-EBC8-4823-B40C-4AE5707102CE@icloud.com>
References: <152691925195.23085.2224548530108903025@ietfa.amsl.com> <A8418B2F-DD4C-4B85-B77A-3A5473788E87@icloud.com> <m2r2lzvfze.wl-randy@psg.com> <1401F133-EBC8-4823-B40C-4AE5707102CE@icloud.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/j7MrtBlg7T7RRonu8R-2rmUyu-w>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-25.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 05:36:50 -0000

> By the way, do you remember this thread on NANOG <https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2017-September/092373.html> in which the draft was mentioned?  Have you seen any mention of the draft on any other ops forums?  (I have not.  Googling for its full name turned up no ops forum results, and only the NANOG thread when using the abbreviation [bgp-extended-messages].) One of my concerns is if the ops community knows enough about this draft to understand its implications.  Also, I agree with the sentiment expressed by several others that there are issues that are possibly beyond the scope of IDR.  We could continue this discussion in GROW, perhaps.

enjoy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email