[Idr] draft-retana-bgp-custom-decision-01: compare from different AS
Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com> Sat, 02 April 2011 17:40 UTC
Return-Path: <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1E33A6873 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qpO4LFtVLJ98 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D663A685B for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p32HfhwL029681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:41:43 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.2.141]) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) with mapi; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 13:41:42 -0400
From: Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
To: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:41:45 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-retana-bgp-custom-decision-01: compare from different AS
Thread-Index: AcvxXTpbvqRelUTnQ+eGmgDN/DJcfQ==
Message-ID: <C9A9D3BD-D0B9-4F85-BACF-6A40C257C740@ericsson.com>
References: <8249B703AE8442429AF89B86E8206AA26EF567C36F@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <8249B703AE8442429AF89B86E8206AA26EF567C36F@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Idr] draft-retana-bgp-custom-decision-01: compare from different AS
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:40:04 -0000
Was there a discussion among the authors about the merit of a rule like for the med not to compare values of the transitive cost community received from different AS's? Could you summarize the discussions please? -- Jakob Heitz.
- [Idr] draft-retana-bgp-custom-decision-01: compar… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [Idr] draft-retana-bgp-custom-decision-01: co… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] draft-retana-bgp-custom-decision-01: co… Jakob Heitz