[Idr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 05:32 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-shutdown@ietf.org, Susan Hares <skh@ndzh.com>, aretana@cisco.com, idr-chairs@ietf.org, skh@ndzh.com, idr@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149560393986.28455.14877358573594421068.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 22:32:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/m2xK7lhI5LB2izXV2arSZFgmYWc>
Subject: [Idr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-shutdown/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Since this notification message is only defined for two of the subcodes,
shouldn't the error handling in Section 4 also check for invalid
subcodes?

Why is the length limited to 128 (instead of the possible 255)? Could be
useful to clarify.

[Idr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-iet… Suresh Krishnan
Re: [Idr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft… Job Snijders