Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]

Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Sun, 03 November 2019 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A246712004F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 15:54:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QpAbJi_m0Uxt for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 15:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15DFB12004D for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 15:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E4C60268B69FD7D94E9C for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:54:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:54:27 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 07:54:19 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]
Thread-Index: AdWST8TcB6zINyDtTeeHcnCihiab1gAUhFnw
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 23:54:18 +0000
Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5D48DD2@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <001601d59252$0e65bde0$2b3139a0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <001601d59252$0e65bde0$2b3139a0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.202.166]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5D48DD2NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/m9Is8__fZ-qQQFH23nf0xy39v0Y>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 23:54:39 -0000

Support.

Thanks,
Shunwan


From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2019 10:22 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]

Greetings IDR:

The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt
was inconclusive.  We had clear support, but just not enough response.
This is a second WG adoption call.

This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752
"Border Gateway Protocol – Link   State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry"
from Designated Expert to  Expert Review.

These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of
code point or code points in the registry.
The only difference is instructions for the review.

Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the
BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.

John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for
BGP-LS quicker response to code requests.  We encourage the WG to
read and strongly consider this draft.

Cheerily, Sue