[Idr] Re: Fw:[SR-TE]Adoption call for 3 drafts: 1)draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flags, 2)draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize, 3)draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt (6/22/2026 to7/14/2026

张天魁 <zhangtiankui@bupt.edu.cn> Mon, 29 June 2026 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangtiankui@bupt.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2F810976B2C; Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1782694245; bh=eu7oTz5N1LEhu7ZSw0+1jPhfSIzt8yVZqGTAEctkNwE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=Bj7An+i3LDX+7wN4AC0lQr6t7cLwN0gtlfOlN5f9g8wkKafin+J9iG4CZ7CxjRA5B ItKMYcrILX9B7yHKry9dXWXWqwm8afZ9AHqZG5ca4MArAyrtDgtZ0fyMWPGI4Tldu7 AALXacBKcrF4FuZuswCapF9HSTAzaJKxR/C01O0o=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBaGXH8IQG4z; Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbgeu1.qq.com (smtpbgeu1.qq.com [52.59.177.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1B110976AD8; Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
EX-QQ-RecipientCnt: 4
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000000000F0
X-QQ-XMRINFO: M/715EihBoGS47X28/vv4NpnfpeBLnr4Qg==
X-QQ-FEAT: D4aqtcRDiqQGhVkG0tmdxl2hSL+K3ALE0uWC6k3V5UY=
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-QQ-Originating-IP: b5LnzQpnGbPVMcr7HorFA7gAHmS6Dd9RmnwYY3DkiNza2zxLjHI/baKSsFR0dGhowDQbfgyLr2aC6y1Jte3o2A==
X-Originating-IP: 255.255.59.218
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: lv4gz3a-0t1782694227t3021660d
From: 张天魁 <zhangtiankui@bupt.edu.cn>
To: Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>, shares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_6A41C152_6018EC20_0BC42362"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:50:26 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_2CD91EAD2EEAC0AD40B083BE@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-BIZMAIL-ID: 13690071672193347784
X-Address-Ticket: version=;type=;ticket_id=;id_list=;display_name=;session_id=;
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Received: from qq.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with SMTP id ; Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:50:27 +0800 (CST)
Feedback-ID: lv:bupt.edu.cn:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz6b-0
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: Nn/16j/V0GWrHAT+1Do0qNd1g15KDmuf+NvBvl8cXkIIK451WUlpg/tc jNdU65cXyzj9uv021Y1WUBzhqLIttgMnYu/3Jw6zn8nVVWD0weB06B8hhfX/N0elrpw2PFd gikXYF6oZa/1P47gLoDf+f4jKKtND1QpCJ9NN5Vp3x6wuNrCnpUWIDTBpBQKrJRLQnPmNuV NP97kbnC8e3/bsbGmyU03fGA0Cj+FSKVdhjvpf03qcq4ga9orBoC/XtFr+qTGnxtFOd/B5/ 37meHN7GEES+9OKlvEe+QEZIVnyjtrWJFGKlG9bfUCBUiE2xMiYYSLIyoLo2Kb7zU7r1gZk dTteet7JGAiiXWp9PUduOTuhEgb2Ovwu451+Nha8+mNvKkeoDLLtmYgfFy82yUB34xjHpbr gndnReNTZkSL4X4GUDOQVPnPo8t0BBk34wkphSS+lDoPSM3OT0sc8qJd6WTGfAevCQGFeb3 omT7KxYtgkSkze1hgAtJFoVhWymBZYi6WSm1wD7tIzeN+B5I6a2X4v9uixE7tKxrEkBrwI7 cexmwqV+cTAUzbbch24bDM6xZSHD01rv/Co325nEKivi42R4Pr96XhtIpIT6yDuEJdFYnAa sPanB77MWgc9qYXexY3EWpIBNqNsQJCxE8NJtJp5hrr0AQkd+hLl+x9blFAhEbU95Fh+48W 3L+fwgfQ897ja2ssTbsX1v2px4ZLKEOYXMNPLH3lbTMEhVdBjV6bk+/8QmuY/t1y39WLU0r 5O081KAI354xQdREAQdeldGE1tvMqmY5Cw2DWDptk4mDKhsolBSReeDT9nMc2W3lzaoXgIY KGydqa/qGGyZouDvRon5Su1xQ/gV5O8iC8l5Dg0dKv3AeT47C7y8Sy9Pmwwds4N96j2KTtC yP34zLGH0qub/sVvnFNKCLZhi/kFjl4WELVriI7wsd04brDbNuJ66QfBWOExRRUGu1bNN7j MeXMXf2bbEP1dFJxKjxBnGOvNP6pOqkG4gAJ1x6ZGUUqTuDzfHsKCdvrFoeuSSZRAJyMpMh 26EhBbYPpO68Dnpxz4Wk9a7utdUy0TJLsKqp6RjLUIXirOuKonT31u05WapZ6dO396ONQJY e9s7Z2eH19XYnk/G8ptqKc=
X-QQ-RECHKSPAM: 0
Message-ID-Hash: FL6B4KAD3JUEF4IQ2NNGVXPFA2HCLTCL
X-Message-ID-Hash: FL6B4KAD3JUEF4IQ2NNGVXPFA2HCLTCL
X-MailFrom: zhangtiankui@bupt.edu.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Fw:[SR-TE]Adoption call for 3 drafts: 1)draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flags, 2)draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize, 3)draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt (6/22/2026 to7/14/2026
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/n5ViwgaqBX_ephuMEy9Pp9KdeEg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Dear Susan Hares,

I am a co-author on draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize-06.txt, and I don't know of any undisclosed IPR on that draft.

Regards,

Tiankui Zhang&nbsp;

&nbsp;


-------- Forwarding messages --------
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com&gt;
Date: 2026-06-24 00:46:20
To:  "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org&gt;,spring <spring@ietf.org&gt;
Cc:  pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org&gt;,srv6ops-chairs <srv6ops-chairs@ietf.org&gt;
Subject: [Idr] [SR-TE]Adoption call for 3 drafts: 1) draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flags, 2) draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize, 3) draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt  (6/22/2026 to 7/14/2026
        
Greetings: 
 
&nbsp;
 
This is an adoption 3 week WG adoption call sent to IDR and Spring for the following 3 drafts:
 
1. draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flag-05.txt – 
 
2. draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize-06.txt 
 
3. draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt 
 
&nbsp;
 
Both WGs must agree that these drafts are useful and appropriate. 
 
&nbsp;
 
The authors of these three drafts should respond to this email with an IPR Statement specifying the following: 
 
1) draft you are a co-author on, 
 
2) Whether you know of any IPR on that draft. 
 
&nbsp;
 
Background for the WG and Spring. 
 
&nbsp;
 
&nbsp;[I-D. draft-ietf-spring-srv6-policy-sid- list-opt] specifies procedures to indicate whether the endpoint's node SID needs to be included or excluded when installing the SRv6 &nbsp;Policy.
 
&nbsp;
 
1) draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flags specifies as Segment List Administrative Flags as segment list SubTLV. Flags include: 
 
S- admin shutdown, B- backup ineligible, I-Ignore service route's Prefix SID, D- drop upon invalid (section 8.2, RFC9256), and E – eligible. 
 
2) draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize  = &nbsp;adds a flag of flag INF-Flag to Segment list administrative flags specified by draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flags. &nbsp;The value (1) for INF-Flags indicates endpoint node SID is included in installing SID list(s) of the Candidate  Path (CP) when set.
 
3) draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt - &nbsp;send INF-Flag in BGP-LS 
 
&nbsp;
 
Why 3 drafts in 1 call?  
 
As you can see from the description, if draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flags is not adopted – then the other two drafts cannot be adopted. 
 
Similarly, if draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimized is not adopted, then draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution cannot be adopted. 
 
&nbsp;
 
Questions for Spring WG:  
 
1) Do these drafts correct implement [draft-ietf-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-opt] concepts?&gt; 
 
2) Do you see any problem with the adoption of any of these three drafts: 
 
(draft-lin-idr-sr-policy-admin-flag-05.txt, draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize-06.txt, draft-ali-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-sl-opt-distribution-00.txt) 
 
&nbsp;
 
Question for IDR:
 
1) Are there any problems in the technology descriptions? 
 
2) Does the status and setting of this flag work? &nbsp;Are the “delays” inherent in BGP distribution a concern? 
 
3) Does this draft help operators deploy SRv6? 
 
&nbsp;
 
Question for Spring and IDR:  
 
1) &nbsp;Does this draft open any error issues? 
 
&nbsp;
 
Please include in your comments – Support or No support for adoption. 
 
&nbsp;
 
Cheerily, Susan Hares  
 
 
 
 

   




&nbsp;