Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07.txt

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> Fri, 22 June 2012 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AC021F84D9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DB0xdOTJFg4H for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og111.obsmtp.com (exprod7og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3134521F84D6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob111.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT+TFOXfjB9MrUN19KnvNMPxQ7DafiAe9@postini.com; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:19:22 PDT
Received: from [172.16.13.202] (172.16.13.202) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:18:27 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FE4C445.1040005@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:18:30 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <2C98F87E-9248-4A4D-8083-BB2189937983@juniper.net>
References: <20120622191027.2782.31128.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FE4C445.1040005@cisco.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org wg" <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:19:23 -0000

Thanks, Enke. To add to this, there is (I believe) just one normative change. 

-06 says:

   The AS4_PATH attribute in an UPDATE message SHALL be considered
   malformed under the following conditions:

      - the attribute length is not a multiple of two, or is too small
        (i.e., less than 6) for the attribute to carry at least one
        AS number, or

      - the path segment length in the attribute is either zero, or
        is inconsistent with the attribute length, or

      - the path segment type in the attribute is not one of the
        types defined: AS_SEQUENCE, AS_SET.

-07 changes the final bullet:

   The AS4_PATH attribute in an UPDATE message SHALL be considered
   malformed under the following conditions:

      - the attribute length is not a multiple of two, or is too small
        (i.e., less than 6) for the attribute to carry at least one
        AS number, or

      - the path segment length in the attribute is either zero, or
        is inconsistent with the attribute length, or

      - the path segment type in the attribute is not one of the
        types defined: AS_SEQUENCE, AS_SET, AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE
        and AS_CONFED_SET.

Regards,

--John

On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Enke Chen wrote:

> Hi, folks:
> 
> The revised version addresses comments received during the IETF Last 
> Call.  The diff is larger due to several terminology related changes:
> 
>> Q_GEN-1: Sometimes the text says "AS number", and sometimes 
> "Autonomous System number". Please use consistant terminology.
>> Q_GEN-2: Sometimes the text says "2-octet", and sometimes 
> "two-octet". Please use consistant terminology.
>> Q_GEN-3: Sometimes the text says "4-octet", and sometimes 
> "four-octet". Please use consistant terminology.
> 
> Thanks.  -- Enke
> 
> On 6/22/12 12:10 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>  This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>> 	Title           : BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space
>> 	Author(s)       : Quaizar Vohra
>>                           Enke Chen
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07.txt
>> 	Pages           : 12
>> 	Date            : 2012-06-22
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>    The Autonomous System number is encoded as a two-octet entity in the
>>    base BGP specification. This document describes extensions to BGP to
>>    carry the Autonomous System numbers as four-octet entities.  This
>>    document obsoletes RFC 4893.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07
>> 
>> A diff from previous version is available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rfc4893bis-07
>> 
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr