Re: [Idr] Early Code Point allocation for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-05 (12/8 to 12/22)

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Sun, 10 December 2017 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEC1126CF9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:55:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q_vjtp1DT6mT for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:55:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5D0120454 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:55:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13764; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512885342; x=1514094942; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=yt/1A0+GA1TSmnN85C42McPOIIFn1bdi4ZJ0ZgcQ4wY=; b=Q0eg/hq5h/froHCSqAa+7xtahWHZo2RFRibAaCeX8LZXnBQcW53H6S4N l1fi2NeiEjcG7YzJH0MJmY/n6QDzsGOfGBOoZmK81En06f6nA2H/hCUDg WNS5GrR036PLQ7Vab9LvMes43FDu1Yjlo+lrb4slU85AdRUsGeczLRLYW E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D1CACFyyxa/4ENJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKdGZ0JweDe4ohjl8BHYF9flyPZ4VLghUKI4UYAhqERT8YAQEBAQEBAQEBayiFIgEBAQEDHQYKXAIBCA4DAwEBASgDAgICMBQJCAEBBAESCIk8ZBCmbIInimMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYNogWEBKYFWgWmCdTaDMoINFoJfgmMFmUuJRgKHd40fgh+GEos7jQqJJwIRGQGBOgEfOYFPbxU6gimDB4FOeIhbgRUBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,386,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217";a="328731445"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Dec 2017 05:55:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBA5te4V023097 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:55:41 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 23:55:40 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 23:55:40 -0600
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Early Code Point allocation for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-05 (12/8 to 12/22)
Thread-Index: AdNwR0Ep3YRSQoYwSe+55gJblUBfMAAA6CEAAA9FeAAAPOFTMA==
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:55:40 +0000
Message-ID: <a6469f0d367c48e2a062276f6ca9a785@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
References: <014101d37047$63eef530$2bccdf90$@ndzh.com> <D6503705.E0A23%acee@cisco.com> <005501d37055$adbbbf50$09333df0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <005501d37055$adbbbf50$09333df0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.119.62]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a6469f0d367c48e2a062276f6ca9a785XCHALN014ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nV3n1CQLCvsEDFFdpC0tZCE8ruU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Early Code Point allocation for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-05 (12/8 to 12/22)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:55:45 -0000

I support.

Thanks,
Jakob

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Early Code Point allocation for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-05 (12/8 to 12/22)

Acee:

I agree with your viewpoint.   IDR and ISIS/OSPF are very thoughtful about the drafts they adopt.  The IDR WG has clearly stated they want allocations done whenever possible. However, I have gotten push-back from this IESG.   So, I’ve made this call to the WG.

Sue Hares

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 12:35 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Early Code Point allocation for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-05 (12/8 to 12/22)

Hi Sue,

I support early allocation. In fact, for WG documents I think we shouldn’t place such a high bar on early allocation.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 12:10 PM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] Early Code Point allocation for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-05 (12/8 to 12/22)

This begins a  week WG call for approval of early code point allocation for draft-ietf-eag-distribution-05.txt.
You can view the specification at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution/

The specification has gone through 5 revisions.  There are two organizations interested in implementing this specification.   Please send in your comments by 12/22.

Susan Hares