Re: [Idr] draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-04 - IPR call prior to WG adoption call (2/24 to 3/4)

"Susan Hares" <> Mon, 24 February 2020 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6467A3A1191 for <>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:29:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.325
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HipzTGDoWdPK for <>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:29:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D2C3A0D7F for <>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:29:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: 'Huaimo Chen' <>, 'Robert Raszuk' <>
Cc: "'idr@ietf. org'" <>
References: <002101d5eb19$12b85e00$38291a00$>, <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:29:41 -0500
Message-ID: <001101d5eb48$c376c090$4a6441b0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01D5EB1E.DAA23F30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGHX67QpzVXGpvgBgADZxXZ01QUAQGa8i05AnKmZ1+op2UgYA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200223-0, 02/23/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-04 - IPR call prior to WG adoption call (2/24 to 3/4)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:29:48 -0000

Robert and Huaimo:


Perhaps Robert has some nagging concerns.  You might want to discuss this
point before I start the WG adoption call (either on/off list) 


Cheers, Sue 


From: Idr [] On Behalf Of Huaimo Chen
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 2:22 PM
To: Robert Raszuk; Susan Hares
Cc: idr@ietf. org
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-04 - IPR call
prior to WG adoption call (2/24 to 3/4)


Hi Robert,


    We have addressed all the comments from the last adoption call [4/18 -
5/2/2019] in the updated document/draft.  For example, the extensions to
BGP-LS for SIDs are removed, and a new AFI/SAFI for SIDs is used as
suggested by some people. This seems a core change.


    The updated document is presented in IETF 106, and there is no objection
during our presentation.


    In addition, I have communicated with all the people who were against
the adoption during the last adoption call and did not receive any
objection. Only one person hopes that Yang could be used for SIDs.


Best Regards,



From: Idr <> on behalf of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 9:05 AM
To: Susan Hares <>
Cc: idr@ietf. org <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-04 - IPR call
prior to WG adoption call (2/24 to 3/4) 




We already had adoption call for this draft and comments received were not
in favor. 


May I ask why are we to repeat this all over again especially as the core
theme of the draft did not change ? 







PS. Below is the original adoption call: 


From: Idr [mailto: <>] On
Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 10:05 AM
To:  <>
Subject: [Idr] draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-02.txt [4/18 -
5/2/2019] - 2 week WG adoption call


This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for
draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-02.txt.  You can access the draft


In your comments, consider:



On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:48 PM Susan Hares <> wrote:



This begins an IPR call for draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-ext-04.txt prior to WG
adoption call.   The WG adoption call will begin as soon as all the authors
have responded to this message.  


For authors who have responded to an IPR call, please you will need to again
respond to this IPR call. 


Cheers, Susan Hares 


Idr mailing list