IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-16

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 27 January 2025 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E55C1D4CF5; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 10:11:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XwGNtURaTfVK; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 10:11:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBDCC1D4CE6; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 10:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7E6AE1E28C; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:11:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:11:26 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Message-ID: <20250127181126.GG16232@pfrc.org>
References: <173707410060.1124002.6768660214222275123@dt-datatracker-57c4c68d9c-p9khg> <CAOj+MMHU80vP4RfQ3z0=Lppu4WNHYdBw9bEEnXhfnMmYYx-2cQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHU80vP4RfQ3z0=Lppu4WNHYdBw9bEEnXhfnMmYYx-2cQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Message-ID-Hash: AJ5APLLEOMQKDBKLDLCZCUG6CJQJB7WI
X-Message-ID-Hash: AJ5APLLEOMQKDBKLDLCZCUG6CJQJB7WI
X-MailFrom: jhaas@slice.pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, keyur@arrcus.com, shares@ndzh.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set-16
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/quthJ_iTA5VlQl2ndsLwBeyxyH4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Robert,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:32:34PM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> I have a question in respect to section 3.
> 
> Is this to be applied on any BGP speaker (as written currently) or only on
> the EBGP peering sessions ?

Any speaker, as currently written.

> PS. Treat-as-withdraw seems like a big hammer to me, but if folks think
> as-sets deserve such a weapon, so be it.

That has been the long consensus.

-- Jeff

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status