IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Soliciting feedback on merging draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis and draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-08.txt - (1 week request 6/16 to 6/23).

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 19 June 2017 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8DD1295A0; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EpTSVDdV689B; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2BF129584; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9319; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1497915532; x=1499125132; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=0B3i7C5d7NXcQoH/F2dG9PS3or9DvGwSMPsEybEkyFU=; b=AwrkXXxxAgJQcjx+oHA5LanIvjp62VwLx7Pi/EPXNtsEjig+U96AUUgV +wtU9skYWmFCW+TDae+ng2XpCejYXIjl6IfdYbJ3B8Pfy++Pvz9y30mig ccwdZvv14X98WLjFx46MjqpaIqpWlkbvhL2gavZBNjE3I/KyIYhm0/uBm s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ApBAAvX0hZ/5JdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm88LWKBDQeDZJwVkE2FKoIRhiQCGoI/QRYBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMjCkcFEAIBCA4DAwECJAQDAgICMBQJCAEBBAENBYlIZK1ZgiaLWwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2LMTSBJIMiMRKCcoJhBZ5eApNdkg2VCAEmCCmBCnQVSYVCgU12hxGBMYENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,363,1493683200"; d="scan'208,217";a="437805151"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jun 2017 23:38:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5JNcouw010012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:38:51 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:38:50 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:38:50 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Soliciting feedback on merging draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis and draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-08.txt - (1 week request 6/16 to 6/23).
Thread-Index: AdLmsAvRYnHqSFfgRvyH71rHYhZ1ZwCpSUiA
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:38:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D56DD873.B5B68%acee@cisco.com>
References: <00fe01d2e6b0$7ad57dd0$70807970$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00fe01d2e6b0$7ad57dd0$70807970$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D56DD873B5B68aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rYdoCWo5KXxALU0HyVeARyaJBGY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Soliciting feedback on merging draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis and draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-08.txt - (1 week request 6/16 to 6/23).
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:38:55 -0000

Hi Sue,

While I don’t feel strongly one way or another, I’d say that the documents are at roughly the same stage of maturity and could be combined if the authors are amenable.  Of course, one obstacle is the arbitrary five author limit.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Friday, June 16, 2017 at 10:54 AM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>" <idr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:idr-chairs@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] Soliciting feedback on merging draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis and draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-08.txt - (1 week request 6/16 to 6/23).

<WG chair hat off>

I and my co-authors on drasft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis would like feedback if the working group would like us to merge draft-ietf-idr-5575bis and draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-08.txt.  The benefit of the merge, is that the basic v4 and v6 flow specification work would be available in one draft.   The “con” of the merge is that the draft-ietf-idr-5575bis will include the v6 rather than just changes.

We’ll take feedback for 1 week.   After that, we hope to finalize draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis.txt and ask for WG LC.

Thank you,

Sue Hares (author hat on)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email