[Idr] 3/30 status - incremental

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 30 March 2020 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918783A02BD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 05:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=1.449, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3IQcKtTTF6C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 05:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF653A02BB for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 05:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.25.188;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'IDR List'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:43:31 -0400
Message-ID: <01af01d60690$d21ea7d0$765bf770$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01B0_01D6066F.4B11C2C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdYGkItY/8IXwtLmR9W4ERjEFsohYQ==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200329-0, 03/29/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tjo2UQtkObRok-bVUBqGrXMuiCY>
Subject: [Idr] 3/30 status - incremental
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:43:38 -0000

Good morning IDR: 

 

For reading before our meeting.   

 

I'll be adding WG LC and Adoptions after our meeting today. 

So, if I have missed something - please send me a note. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares 

 

 

================

 

At RFC editor - missing reference  

*
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext/
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16   [270 days]  
*	Draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-epe-19.txt  [315 days] 

 

Sent to IESG for publication --- Turning on  

1)  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/>
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14 - sent to IESG 

       Shepherd: John Scudder 

       Status:  2nd revision after AD review 

       [IESG Publication requested: 10/10/2019

       AD evaluation begins: 1/17/2020 - 2/21/2020

      Pending for draft since: [38 days] 2/21/2020   

 

2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt

     [Shepherd: Susan Hares]

     Status:  3rd round of AD revisions  

     IESG Publication requested:  10/15/2019

     Pending Revised ID:    17 days [3/13/2020] 

     Shepherd's comments updated:  3/3/2020

   

 

3) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.txt 

      [Shepherd: Susan Hares]

       Status: Awaiting revised ID  [21 days] 

      [IESG Publication requested: 10/15/2019 

      AD Evaluation begins:  2/11/2020 (1 day) 

      Pending Revised ID:  48 days [2/11/2020] 

 

4) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19.txt - 

    Shepherd: John Scudder 

    Status:  IETF LC 

    IESG Publication request: 7/9/2019 

   2  AD Reviews [8/2-9/10/2019, [1/17-1/23/2020]

   

      

 

----------

WG LC done - needing adjustments before submission to IESG 

 

1) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param [Shepherd: Susan Hares]  

Next Steps:

  1) ) Author:  Wiki report on implementations needs 

    details on what is supported by each implementation 

   2) Shepherd write-up:  [ETA 3/31]  

 

 

2)  draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt - 

      Shepherd: Susan Hares 

      WG LC:  [10/30/2019 to 11/13/2019] - extended for 1 week to 11/24. 

       Status: [on hold awaiting decision from AD and WG chairs] 

     Next Steps: 

       1) Shepherd Write-up  ETA: 3/31

       2) Author: Updated Wiki on  implementations 

 

3) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis.05.txt  

    Shepherd: Susan Hares 

      Next Steps:  submit -06.txt 

      Waiting Revised ID:  Draft -06.txt - with IANA nits fixed.

      Next Steps:  

1) Authors spin -06.txt by 4/2/2020 or 

  Reassign authors for draft-06.txt (4/2/2020) 

 

-----------

WG LC Flow Specification Holding: 

 

1)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-09.txt 

      Shepherd:  Susan Hares

      Status: Support for WG publication, but interoperability issues raised

      Next steps:  Flow Specification NG discussion 

 

 

5)  draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt - 

      Shepherd: Susan Hares 

      WG LC:  [10/30/2019 to 11/13/2019] - extended for 1 week to 11/24. 

       Status: [on hold awaiting decision from AD and WG chairs] 

       ETA: 3/8/2020 

 

WG LC 

---------

1) Draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt 

     WG LC:  3/3/ to 3/17/2020 

      Shepherd [John Scudder] 

      Comment:  v6 additions to RFC5575bis 

         Needed for v4 publication at IESG  

 

WG Adoption 

----------------

   1) Draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec

       WG adoption:  3/30-4/13

        Shepherd: Susan Hares 

        Comment: See IETF 105 presentations + email 

 

2) draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec-transport-mode

     WG Adoption: 3/30 - 4/13

      Shepherd: Susan Hares 

     Comment: See IETF 105 presentation + email 

 

3) draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt 

    WG adoption: 3/30 - 4/13 

     Shepherd: Susan Hares 

   

 

WG Adoption/ Interest Calls:  for Flow Specification information 

===============

Since the flow specification will require a IETF 107 WG discussion, 

These WG adoption calls are interest calls.   

We hope to provide the 

 

1)  draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6-02.txt 

   Status: On Hold due to Flow Specification Discussion

   IPR status: All holds cleared 

    Next Step:  3/30 + 4/8 IDR meetings 

 

2)        draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nv03-06.txt - 

        Status: On Hold due to Flow Specification Discussion  

         Next Steps:  3/30 and + 4/8 meetings 

         draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nv03-13.txt 

 

 

WG Adoption requested (on  hold) 

--------------------------------------------

Draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-04.txt

IPR Call:  completed 

Hold: WG adoption on hold due to on list discuss 

Shepherd: Susan Hares; 

Next Step: 

   1)Shepherd:  Chairs needs to resolve

          

AD's Comments requiring in depth work to solve: 

----------------------------------

1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12

       Status:  AD discussion requires rework of draft.   

 

2)
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflectio
n/> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-20

    Status: Awaiting a rework of draft.