IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Any IDR WG experience to share regarding Extended Community SubType allocation?

"Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> Tue, 05 June 2018 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DA1131032 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 05:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCrZCPHCwHP9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 05:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00095.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B16C613104D for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MUfvYtDjrDfpgifTxol/8seeJRm+HqZ9fKfjGQfQacI=; b=fouesBNFwB3+M9ZiS51klWa6Dd1ujSuyn7YRDsAQx1jbbBKg1wVPdATMJOQhNk6UUFA6ThSml4zGhDVYU1hKx+JJA7ZLyReYTSe2PUlwakmbWvAftPYpyAcrKjRTddXw/a9hUq6/djrsjoN4PkmFUZ6OxNSaOxNfaXwELDwDWco=
Received: from AM5PR0701MB1729.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.167.215.136) by AM5PR0701MB2867.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.155.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.841.7; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:54:27 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB1729.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9d9a:e23b:b41c:5908]) by AM5PR0701MB1729.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9d9a:e23b:b41c:5908%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0841.011; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:54:27 +0000
From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Any IDR WG experience to share regarding Extended Community SubType allocation?
Thread-Index: AdP8zEa0WLejRKpEQMCgPs67m0Ydhg==
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:54:27 +0000
Message-ID: <AM5PR0701MB17299B5CAD53739816412CDAE0660@AM5PR0701MB1729.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.245.20.9]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2867; 7:h9Eutr/1xiWVYBt8bqhnKCRltUcW1ndnpYbVZ5xmttXHXGgcJIQmi1Gu50RQcZrGrsNg8rhJ8BirKfGLxBLeJQXoPyUu8mfX+lcaummZRI3XjCAPQdg4lkjM84QfWUSVSViOLwIdGOT3bo8fvplrYlVwDqT1zXivud5Xcbipvs1XMPRu3Ino1hv+4EqgnUIO8XFhYLFKdiCozONHDbnKsaY6xJc6wwSCtKJmFhbqeVILcmB2Id0y5YvRXmnDE+Ad
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(8989080)(48565401081)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990040)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2867;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2867:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM5PR0701MB2867D706F9ACBBD175732DA1E0660@AM5PR0701MB2867.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(21748063052155)(1591387915157);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(3231254)(11241501184)(806099)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2867; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2867;
x-forefront-prvs: 0694C54398
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(53754006)(199004)(189003)(8936002)(105586002)(53936002)(102836004)(99286004)(9686003)(81166006)(66066001)(6306002)(55016002)(236005)(1730700003)(106356001)(476003)(81156014)(8676002)(2900100001)(606006)(74316002)(6506007)(7696005)(6436002)(97736004)(54896002)(2501003)(5640700003)(2351001)(486006)(86362001)(5630700001)(26005)(25786009)(7736002)(316002)(5660300001)(3280700002)(186003)(478600001)(790700001)(3660700001)(68736007)(3846002)(2906002)(33656002)(6916009)(14454004)(966005)(6116002)(5250100002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2867; H:AM5PR0701MB1729.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: WWoXie8L5ZGitokQpSNhth1rmJRmQ3YYMUFKAuL2jYrj4w52WDygd2RIGnqOu+9TMTqVRmIO9uzj4+0d+JI7LNwBux9Zlkx5O1J/5MjH4gk0COAj5RJpvpOK/RK87Gd+cpEFkzaPw/Hudo4GnnN3SVVCn1PophOb/5nEBnAPx5sbVk8Z14YMi9IUb7SpMTZR93IU7fTL1H096UiksZrX6paKafWnxuHyFb+Y2t5kl4d1Bxr7piJKwsCO6jK7/1mt
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM5PR0701MB17299B5CAD53739816412CDAE0660AM5PR0701MB1729_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: e6c2a45a-c2f2-42ab-84fc-08d5cae378e1
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e6c2a45a-c2f2-42ab-84fc-08d5cae378e1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jun 2018 12:54:27.6305 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2867
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/uZSfn_wnxFClyT06ShD_XpoIEcw>
Subject: [Idr] Any IDR WG experience to share regarding Extended Community SubType allocation?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:54:35 -0000

Hi all,

I'm trying to document the best allocation for the Extended community subtype used for "FlowSpec Redirect to indirection-id Extended Community"

When looking at some of the other Subtype's I see that some are unassigned, some are FCFS and some have IETF Review.

For example:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities/bgp-extended-communities.xhtml#trans-two-octet-as

For the indirection-id redirect we have 8 bits available for SubType and am wondering how to best carve-up that space? Any suggestions or previous experience from the WG?
(I assume that these guidelines will be used by IANA afterwards when allocating future SubType codepoints)

G/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email