Re: [Idr] Need information on planned implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-07

"Susan Hares" <> Thu, 12 September 2019 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB8A120823 for <>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0c02gbCHb02 for <>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ABC512080C for <>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)'" <>,
References: <001e01d56931$54a633b0$fdf29b10$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 03:43:17 -0400
Message-ID: <018801d5693d$be220600$3a661200$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0189_01D5691C.3712D700"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJW0AmJtDrv4yen1s6pBmtFVutbhgFzYwtXphk+pgA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190911-2, 09/11/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Need information on planned implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-07
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:43:41 -0000



The information on the two cisco implementations 

is accurate and complete.   Thank you for your careful work. 

These two implementation reports are sufficient for 

IDR requirement for 2 implementations.  


This request is asking for anyone who plans an 

implementation of this draft but has not implemented the draft. 

This request is simply an information gathering request.


This request will not delay the publication request.   

The only thing I'm waiting on is the Early QA reviews 

(due by 9/14).   If these are positive, then I can request publication. 


Please watch for the RTG-DIR and OPS-DIR reviews. 

I'm hoping these will be in by 9/14.   


Cheers, Sue 


From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [] 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 3:06 AM
To: Susan Hares;
Subject: RE: [Idr] Need information on planned implementations of


FYI the implementation report is available for updates at


From: Idr <> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 12 September 2019 11:44
Subject: [Idr] Need information on planned implementations of




Would anyone who plans to implement or deploy 


please contact me? 


It can be either on-list or off-list?  

I just need a general idea of the number planned 

implementation status for the 

shepherd's report for this draft. 


I'll send the shepherd report by 9/15/2019. 


Cheerily, Susan Hares