Re: [Idr] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-03

[John Scudder <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jakob,

Thanks for catching that! After one read-through, I think your correction is right. I want to give it a little further consideration, though, and ask that other people do the same before we make the change.

To be clear the proposed correction is,

OLD:
   *  For each AFI/SAFI for which it has advertised a nonzero "Long-
      lived Stale Time", the helper router MUST start a timer for that
      "Long-lived Stale Time".  If the timer for the "Long-lived Stale
      Time" for a given AFI/SAFI expires before the session is re-
      established, the helper MUST delete all stale routes of that AFI/
      SAFI from the neighbor that it is retaining.

NEW:
   *  For each AFI/SAFI for which it has received a nonzero "Long-
      lived Stale Time", the helper router MUST start a timer for that
      "Long-lived Stale Time".  If the timer for the "Long-lived Stale
      Time" for a given AFI/SAFI expires before the session is re-
      established, the helper MUST delete all stale routes of that AFI/
      SAFI from the neighbor that it is retaining.

(Simply changes “advertised” to “received” per Jakob’s suggestion.) 

If there aren’t any objections, I’ll plan to make this change to the draft by March 12.

Thanks,

—John

> On Jan 24, 2023, at 10:24 PM, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Apologies for the late comment.
>  
> In the following sentence:
>  
> *  For each AFI/SAFI for which it has advertised a nonzero "Long-
>    lived Stale Time", the helper router MUST start a timer for that
>   "Long-lived Stale Time".
>  
> should the word “advertised” be “received” ?
>  
> The helper router uses the stale-time from the restarting router, not its own stale-time.
>  
> Regards,
> Jakob.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Idr <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2022 7:27 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-03
>  
> With apologies to the authors, the LLGR document had been lingering in my
> task queue to verify the last few comments had been integrated.
>  
> Publication as an RFC has been requested.
>  
> -- Jeff
>  
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 07:25:30AM -0800, Jeffrey Haas via Datatracker wrote:
> > Jeffrey Haas has requested publication of draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr-03 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the IDR working group.
> > 
> > Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-long-lived-gr/
> > 
> >