Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 updates

----- Original Message -----
From: "Yakov Rekhter" <yakov@juniper.net>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 updates

> Folks,
>
> Please comment on the attached request. The deadline for comments
> is March 9, 2009.
>

I think that this is a sensible idea (and yes I understood it the first time:-).

I take it that Yakov's e-mail is in pursuance to RFC4020 3.1 3).

A question; RFC4181 discourages this approach, preferring experimental (which I
think inappropriate here).  Has the IESG approved early allocation for MIB
Modules as per RFC4020 2 a)?  This topic came up on another list recently and
there was no mention of early allocation.  I see no mention of approval on the
IANA website.

Tom Petch

> Yakov.
> ------- Forwarded Message
>
> Date:    Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:24:09 -0500
> From:    Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
> To:      idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] BGP MIBv2 updates
>
> I was requested to be a little more clear here.
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:50:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > In order to encourage implementation of these drafts, I'd like to request an
> > early allocation from the mib-2 space for these MIBs.
>
> I'd like to request an early allocation from mib-2 for the following
> SNMP MODULE-IDENTITYs.
>
>
> bgp4V2, published in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-09.
> bgp4V2TC, published in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-tc-mib-00.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr