[Idr] 回复: Re: Working Group Adoption call and IPR Call for draft-xie-idr-mpbgp-extension-4map6-05 (9/26 - 10/10/2023)

Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> Thu, 05 October 2023 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D2AC15C522 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 02:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7X_tZAeMHd5Z for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 02:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-251-53.mail.qq.com (out203-205-251-53.mail.qq.com [203.205.251.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AA2C15171B for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 02:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1696496541; bh=jqGognfu1YW1HELkgThsfovycqH2+QFkUoweozKUcmk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References; b=XuFTvKjSwFpqgYlv5I7Q4GER6ewDRz4yaMQisqUbyPQXo/6We6JaFVlTGDjH7XCUc It1swxQ0Pha4eAd6mEgundDZIN947EjPUJIuQgJ2FJHGfE9z3Qhmi4Td+7p89vKSjl P7DQEPcokHoBLOwt/XRSJoZlDlU0gLYceIrx+Vaw=
Received: from DESKTOP-48H476U ([221.217.24.236]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc2-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 93A12EA; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 17:02:19 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1696496539t44xdq6r4
Message-ID: <tencent_552A8E0A33DD58C84A8DC2CA7CA06B464007@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MZvzRQfoMq84zQRO64XVVEWpF5OCfB+AJz4IcGpozpowz50MBzYrL0C1ofFjdM TP1R/uzgfbmv6xvWOvH5Bngt4Nm6rMGcd2jmAFsNCCsTJHv/n9cCSxRrfLN3/Xp9oBAFz8Lu9e13 /Zs9N9Pm/CGY8ACy+Jqar0Aegs4SZrv3geH/E/Qw1a9ajmVC/j5gBoSHdyApzuZV9+RGehQqi0On eLgC3qaeQHDZIXNlvLYCvjLdW0s0zhIcZJDFJBUnOrrKg9pVBB9gxbkHd6m4Aw8RrhxOOsl899c3 s81di9Nr3A+1r+UR3vJExBFIbju5jqYCmejG6ETG1q3LCeC+8u6I/aybTLBeEC3ppHV6a/Ms6iqR iippgwrtj2B6Dn1QbgKzhrPoCYP1wiZmj0NYjf9rJMxXKo+HUpm2hPIFIIukdTyjRX5V9RO9hnZB va0Csn7KjL8KIO4L7Ik3deWAKQCuq/QqjU/Vn3ag6ZixiQJdizgHMkf4omWhYg6bQ/enxwNwOZiU sRS6Y7wcjfxmvprgNNuh87dzVw3J0MPzmy7TYMip3qlJ4r3/lS3t8euWr55VXKid4WmxSXqXyCsD bvbPPQJTAsza44ckwZYMaPt1VO41LWCThCFWaqpJxMTUDuBCIj/dnrP/UWCblV9Q4nStLetgqKnN Ki/GXzJWUMTHDt6HHJshnenqXlkZBcbkHaHfuz5PQNzYFTYKu60U9wIf0KRJuTyWMkkfOxmdpzwX 4a5SoxVFJYuuIpEaitjPVRWUXUA/3B/9WKeVLDOPFlE58KLkGBycsMl/QRDbGdL7v+TwFtYiMvVk kajL4Su8xjpdz+qk0AXwr4wGLpSrbh20hn1LwDTJs522/4lILReDe/fQ86tmgfIABovvMteYforr Ssu6P9tFmboRiZcu5P3T5I+asP4SUmLRML95RadI+B7sQeGwk9Pt5aGjsNPj+4aKD2iRqP7Pbiwm fm+8BabBx5r8n3ekqlGcfXevENe5/8a1x5r8BBTo4eXaRyscUKRudBWz7AT7lvkj4u9t3sTf7VxA oGdTSbtw==
X-QQ-XMRINFO: NI4Ajvh11aEj8Xl/2s1/T8w=
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 17:02:21 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
To: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
References: <BYAPR08MB4872BA0BC06F5646742B4CD2B3C2A@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>, <abe10cb3976a40619343002f26d9fc0d@huawei.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 864F7684-C668-4FA8-99B4-BD89DE73E090
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.24.96[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2023100517022079851220@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart834486720578_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/z-6xyhmSUyk3QPxu3qsWxTTKQ-g>
Subject: [Idr] 回复: Re: Working Group Adoption call and IPR Call for draft-xie-idr-mpbgp-extension-4map6-05 (9/26 - 10/10/2023)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:02:58 -0000

Hi Jingrong,
Thank you for your support and comments, see my feedback inline [CF], please. 
 
发件人: Jingrong Xie
发送时间: 2023-10-05 10:28
收件人: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Idr] Working Group Adoption call and IPR Call for draft-xie-idr-mpbgp-extension-4map6-05 (9/26 - 10/10/2023)
Hi Sue and WG:
 
I support the adoption. 
 
My comments to the questions Sue raised:
1) does the 4map6 attribute help  Operators connect islands of IPv4-only support through IPv6 only core. 
--Yes.
 
2) Does this draft provide technical guidance on how this attribute is formatted and used in BGP? 
--Yes.
 
3) Do you think this is the right direction for To solve this problem? 
--Yes.
 
My Additional comments to the document: 
1. To align with draft-ietf-v6ops-framework-md-ipv6only-underlay , “MD database” should be “Mapping rule Database” in my understanding.
[CF]: Sure, we will the terms to be consistent between the two documents. 
 
2. SAFI/AFI=2/1 should not be the only example in section 3.1. 
As stated in abstract: It defines a new BGP path attribute known as the "4map6" to be used in conjunction with the existing AFI/SAFI for IPv4 and IPv6.
My understanding is that, Section 3.1 is describing some “existing AFI/SAFI for IPv4 and IPv6” as following: 
IPv4-Unicast(SAFI/AFI=1/1) and VPNv4(SAFI/AFI=128/1) may be proper and preferred examples to be the “existing AFI/SAFI for IPv4”.
IPv6-Unicast(SAFI/AFI=1/2) and VPNv6(SAFI/AFI=128/2) may be additional examples to be the “existing AFI/SAFI for IPv6”.

[CF]:  Currently, the  "4map6" attribute is used in conjunction with the existing (AFI/SAFI=1/2) for IPv4 service delivery in IPv6-only underlay. I hope this can be further discussed in the coming future. 

Thanks,
Jingrong


Best regards
Chongfeng
 
本邮件及其附件可能含有华为公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
 
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 8:31 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Working Group Adoption call and IPR Call for draft-xie-idr-mpbgp-extension-4map6-05 (9/26 - 10/10/2023)
 
This begins a 2 week WG adoption call from 9/26/2023 to 10/10/2023 for 
draft-xie-idr-mpbgp-extension-4map6-05.txt
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xie-idr-mpbgp-extension-4map6/).
 
The authors should respond to this email indicating whether they know of 
any IPR relating to this draft? 
 
In your comments, please provide the following information
“Support” or “no support”. 
 
Please consider these questions: 
1) does the 4map6 attribute help 
Operators connect islands of IPv4-only support through 
IPv6 only core. 
 
2) Does this draft provide technical guidance 
on how this attribute is formatted and used in BGP? 
 
3) Do you think this is the right direction for 
To solve this problem? 
 
Sue Hares