RE: Proxy: comments on section 9.1.3

["Natale, Jonathan" <[e-mail]>]

Ben,

I like Yakov's better.  Nothing personal.

:-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Abarbanel, Benjamin [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:16 PM
To: 'Yakov Rekhter'; 'Mathew Richardson'
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Proxy: comments on section 9.1.3 

Yakov:
  I hate to sound picky, but could this improve the intended meaning?

  "Any local-policy which results in routes being added to an
   Adj-RIB-Out without also being used for forwarding, is outside the 
   scope of this document."

Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yakov Rekhter [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:08 PM
> To: 'Mathew Richardson'
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Proxy: comments on section 9.1.3 
> 
> 
> Matt,
> 
> > > 'Mathew Richardson' <[e-mail]> [Fri, Sep 06, 2002 
> at 11:16:06AM -040
> 0]:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Replying to myself to correct some poor grammar:
> > 
> > >I think that case must either be disallowed, or placed outside the
> > >scope of the base document.  How about adding to section 9.1.3,
> > >at the end:
> > >
> > >  Any local-policy which results in reachability being added to an
> > >  Adj-RIB-Out without also being added to the local BGP speaker's
> > >  forwarding table, are beyond the scope of this document.
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > The last line should read:
> > 
> >   forwarding table is beyond the scope of this document.
> 
> Accepted with a minor rewording (as follows):
> 
>  Any local-policy which results in routes being added to an
>  Adj-RIB-Out without also being added to the local BGP speaker's
>  forwarding table, is outside the scope of this document.
> 
> Yakov.
>