IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-33: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 30 July 2019 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A72212001E; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OU1jDFtz-cfu; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC51212001A; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id r12so28831126edo.5; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tKayyLlw5bbASVd92YKo2ZDgx/jx1FIG6z0STzM7U6w=; b=Ywz+7fvMVS2NbN9eBl8UODG4hS7zdy0Kbf9WpBgtJPSR1rDACNlIrgRg0FfoHHAF09 ppHTVSHJ1VkOeYgoq3pYqdRWbaUPcHDsORFkVl79M4Q7K2oao1z9BdkBNIsFHbv+0wjy GNCRZpQoMXO+QH3vPLojmsoJ0DqlJzPjgE1rPCSlte72efSi1HQefeORWLd1BvGCjc93 v7l3X9M+sbU++NaftfzpE2pU1QW/PBRYSUR0S5S6qSpLVU4TOBkTrt0wo8qc9RasCqRc sgrhFxathfJ1jEYZS+IjlOwNurFWE1ovISyY3hiEd4M4f4lJQkSZH2RjPydXHn9t17Ip eWww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tKayyLlw5bbASVd92YKo2ZDgx/jx1FIG6z0STzM7U6w=; b=pbpEWT0RsqnzsBAW8RKq596IbVd6cXCLF0+M+YM5iw9wxtik5bOf23XH7Ioy0laLKb 5GDdoEiIN2TD9lx8usFM14RLFcszT8y7aD8lV8+c5rlEAdvgwsWer6ONtCkglYGQr3rV FlSohkSA7kc/p1wta0AkRKqYKFu+ARLYzCnmFJTw7KvdSHDCB1rRrLPN7a4xP0HOXQkU vXHue//37wUWaW+mkyxa/LcumWdvb5TpDUA10RAj4YFivcvQC+dZNywLCBsN6NCObP/Y /9+rEmc4dAxuS2r7AdDYxDKSCs7KJGxpSUZfxhI0lXBrhec2cdIIOf1/Nb6BiSo/UPQJ 0Tzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVHZBHW9KHWhQUouhs9elBM4OY1AtliXvWbpywzk3Qe2modN6YL KNONyzjSNsVGajeVIH0Qa5aBT4IKF1yL6F0TwOdNpXjh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwmVsq16M249YBjcJCojXj1Z9U4T1F2kMKemwKnfZuRocVJAQKwcXyT41ID1rtYlLz3pAoxDN0IU7d20KZmVE=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:a485:: with SMTP id w5mr104314289edb.277.1564517085120; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:04:44 -0400
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m27e7zxpv1.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <156449387998.2643.18137174091685834097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m27e7zxpv1.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:04:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxccHKqaXeGKO1sD9jAiEM7McT9_+VUx4G_nqt_2TX3GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, jie.dong@huawei.com, jgs@juniper.net, idr@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001a8c2d058eeb8571"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/z-_mhtGqtBwW-bQmp3Qdi-Iai6w>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-33: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:04:48 -0000

On July 30, 2019 at 3:52:20 PM, Randy Bush (randy@psg.com) wrote:

> 3) sec 4:
> s/then it must NOT be sent to the neighbor/then it MUST NOT be sent to
the neighbor/and
> s/it must be withdrawn from service/it MUST be withdrawn from service/

i have no problem with this change. does someone want to make an
argument that 4271 being normative obviates normative language here?


Yes.  These changes are not needed precisely because of rfc4271.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email