Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04.txt

"wangw36@chinatelecom.cn" <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn> Fri, 30 October 2020 08:22 UTC

HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:47642.754396332
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.76?logid-4bdb9e171a8e44dcb8bb4918d9790bc9 (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id DED23280097 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:22:21 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71096013@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id 4bdb9e171a8e44dcb8bb4918d9790bc9 for idr@ietf.org; Fri Oct 30 16:22:21 2020
X-Transaction-ID: 4bdb9e171a8e44dcb8bb4918d9790bc9
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: wangw36@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:22:19 +0800
From: "wangw36@chinatelecom.cn" <wangw36@chinatelecom.cn>
To: idr <idr@ietf.org>
References: <160404520906.20574.1066080480520835033@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.18.106[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020103016221949825914@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart171524171300_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/z3y-UfvG7eeFh_37NHpBPiVPlQs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:27:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:22:34 -0000

Hi IDR experts,
 
We have revised the manuscript based on the previous discussion, including:
Modifying the imprecise description of the limitations of existing solutions
The solution of rd-orf mechanism in the scenario of "several VRFs in a PE import VPN routes which carries the same RT" is added
    Any comments are welcome.
 
Best Regards,
Wei
 
 
From: internet-drafts
Date: 2020-10-30 16:06
To: Wei Wang; Aijun Wang; Jie Dong; Shunwan Zhuang; Gyan S. Mishra; Gyan Mishra; Haibo Wang
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04.txt
 
A new version of I-D, draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Wei Wang and posted to the
IETF repository.
 
Name: draft-wang-idr-rd-orf
Revision: 04
Title: Route Distinguisher Outbound Route Filter (RD-ORF) for BGP-4
Document date: 2020-10-30
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 15
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf/
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-04
 
Abstract:
   This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the
   Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF).  RD-ORF is applicable when the
   routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g.
   routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in
   Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario).
 
                                                                                  
 
 
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
 
The IETF Secretariat

Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-wang… wangw36@chinatelecom.cn