Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn (1/19/2015 to 2/2/2015

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 24 February 2015 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAFB1A8889 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:48:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zyp6GIJoTqgP for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D911A8884 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 24137C212; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:48:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:48:05 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <20150224194805.GC25639@pfrc>
References: <04fa01d03405$483d92a0$d8b8b7e0$@ndzh.com> <000d01d03481$afed1480$0fc73d80$@com> <68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24C85828@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet> <02c101d034cc$a2690a30$e73b1e90$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <02c101d034cc$a2690a30$e73b1e90$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zBkF461yGYrAv2A0NLavpjl_3SQ>
Cc: "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@bgp.nu>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>, draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-hao-idr-flowspec-evpn (1/19/2015 to 2/2/2015
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:48:06 -0000

Sue,

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:17:48AM -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
> Donald:
> 
> I hope that service providers will comment on the list on the usefulness of
> this draft.   If you have suggestions on improving the security
> considerations, please send these to the list during the WG adoption call. 

I'm long overdue on this draft, but I would support its adoption if the
authors could comment on the perceived scenario for using this functionality
for offramping (redirect) instead of simply rate-limit/drop.  For those
technologies, it seems like a different mechanism for remotely distributing
802.* service mechanisms may be worth considering.

A final comment to the authors and IDR: Please consider requesting a
different extended community code point than the 0x80 registry.  Eric just
got done cleaning up the thing - let's not anchor anything else under
"experimental" unless it's really an experiment. :-)

-- Jeff