[ieee-ietf-coord] about the broadcast assumption and whether .11 should be treated more like and Ethernet or a 6lo network
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 07:59 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F161B2D44 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYmuxsxwf82q for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BCCB1B2EF4 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4098696; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437551970; x=1438761570; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=1Zg4GMdCtwKA/WwJa3XdR4i/pgiZ+0nQhItgxRj25XE=; b=kaazbZeBoGkDtpBksNaG5WUvHTO9oqoFEzn5/HZQIreOTkpZSz75rmNb 5XZi+kSTvR3Fgel6lLGaFlUxgzSmjrz0cd5TXcMgHs5tp/DiAY76rsldo g1w8IpD2VYNVrcbB5WQJLuZRJDYN8U8oH6lTorzK3GPMzjuOCBWvUu2z3 I=;
X-Files: image003.png, image004.gif, 6LoWPAN Backbone Router.ppt, 15-13-0685-01-wng0_6TiSCH + 802.1 for a new IPv6 MultiLink subnet.pptx : 128034, 87, 49664, 2802419
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,522,1432598400"; d="xml'?pptx'72,48,150?scan'72,48,150,32,208,72,48,145,147,150,217?rels'72,48,150,32,208,72,48,145,147,150,217?jpeg'72,48,150,32,208,72,48,145,147,150,217,145?gif'72,48,150,32,208,72,48,145,147,150,217,145,147?ppt'72,48,150,32,208,72,48,145,147,150,217,145,147,32?png'72,48,150,32,208,72,48,145,147,150,217,145,147,32,150"; a="171141718"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2015 07:59:28 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6M7xPGh020275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:59:26 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.72]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:59:24 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "Dorothy Stanley (DStanley@arubanetworks.com)" <DStanley@arubanetworks.com>
Thread-Topic: about the broadcast assumption and whether .11 should be treated more like and Ethernet or a 6lo network
Thread-Index: AdDEVAiJIcRxQpW3RLCXeOaZr4gogQ==
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:59:23 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:58:19 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F43642@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.206.117]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_009_E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F43642xmbrcdx01ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/WGHq2A6uSRBfLL_eNqRBy-qkYH4>
Cc: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>, "ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] about the broadcast assumption and whether .11 should be treated more like and Ethernet or a 6lo network
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:59:34 -0000
Hello Dorothy: As promised: The backbone router work as it stands: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-03 Proxy ND experimental work (really a bridging thing, misses the proxy state machine and its control by the device through registration) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4389 The 6MAN work draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-07<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-07> draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues<https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues-01.txt> draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches<https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches-01.txt> draft-ietf-6man-rs-refresh<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rs-refresh> The sort of thing we get from 6MAN (very little effective progress for wireless in years) https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg19715.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg19727.html Related https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5942 Cheers, Pascal [IoT] Pascal Thubert Principal Engineer Chief Technology & Architecture Office pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com> Phone :+33 497 23 26 34 Mobile :+33 619 98 29 85 Cisco Systems Building D (Regus) 45 Allee des Ormes - BP1200 06254 MOUGINS cedex France Cisco.com<http://www.cisco.com/global/FR/> [Description: Think before you print.]Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--- Begin Message ---Hello folks, We have made an initial draft to describe problems related to transmission of multicast over 802.11. There will be a presentation about it tomorrow in the [mboned] Working Group. Here is a pointer to the draft: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mcbride-mboned-wifi-mcast-problem-statement-00.txt Questions or comments about the draft will be much appreciated. This is very much a rough initial draft and needs a lot of work. I hope to be able to make a presentation on this subject at the next [intarea] WG meeting in Yokohama. Regards, Charlie P. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area--- End Message ---
- [ieee-ietf-coord] about the broadcast assumption … Pascal Thubert (pthubert)