Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Issue 19: Common OAM proposal / Layer Independent OAM
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 01 February 2016 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61791A92F5 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:56:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apaUtocMA8M1 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362241AC39D for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x234.google.com with SMTP id wb13so88210218obb.1 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:56:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/+EhzLu4zWeXroSY7ZpVFFaq+m//S5Dcze5TLWqAEPw=; b=tYs0QfoaWLTePYn/s8TyXBXV/QQydz9Kz4BvZqgsnaGLVEkXnUycjtu7z3BtkD2gBz OtHM0RLUNcKqeyckhYTMr5SrhR90M9wTtRjrvUoNxzSiHFNuLXZiqBTh3eNTdAtu/3lw x3mXmEdujUnO1Zxr9AZX0Yl9ATNXxxYuaUETJurlr9hKzkRoSaZ2JtmkJpS64r5314md m4bVRrRhXfl3/gEUXYII9exo+od9HuCiLWwfiEbKxS5FVbYC3b7xoA8aOqJT6zxJQX8R GMRKnNPllCwov9k+n8SJwexKVnioQE6Xu+Nl/ydtcAx1jYazBl9aL38P9kXzn0kRJPgh 8YdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/+EhzLu4zWeXroSY7ZpVFFaq+m//S5Dcze5TLWqAEPw=; b=g6mXAkzhUglFYZMeqbcPU+8df3u3W6utGAfnZcQRgbpRJKDy4SREoUTMUUQbbv4LIv QBaZSa89a+HvP+/uIxWsn1Nl7MMKEh33FLKbGdIl/yRRAcg0awc8YFbK6wv01JI3jyM5 yehUXAAorGKs37p5i4hdEGdRV3F+IHAKX7gllNe4k0L5X8+oazLFzJch2a5MyqtWEk4I SnZ0tCt88udMZpGDnENu2bwccjrCZCBn3tnIgZpwSdF7HPu5bKsqPqn//toVUX3+bXNh UzFXQNL5uVJkIu+gNA4BZubxqfEQQW1r/9Stqqkt/+/AUVBStj/RRI+zd1GB0W/g/yN1 +MhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS4PQiAvu2qpeZRtiWzz1czYM488qLbeSR31PlR7pCu4d82iRthhuOKc2zXIf4uFD0I/3lncvouL+BUyA==
X-Received: by 10.60.232.164 with SMTP id tp4mr18561628oec.55.1454338586423; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 06:56:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.157.161 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:56:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56AF6CC6.7000208@cisco.com>
References: <56AF6CC6.7000208@cisco.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 09:56:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGzk65ysAn_N70MH1NPtPUHBT3f3Dnk9GX26igHjMXFWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1136a112d3b8ba052ab696db"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/b1WjJqttctqAims4-qVTQCXG3vE>
Cc: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "lime-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <lime-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Issue 19: Common OAM proposal / Layer Independent OAM
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:56:31 -0000
Hi, I will probably not be able to make the call due to a conflict but I wanted to also note RFC 7319 "IANA Considerations for Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) Code Points" and the IANA registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/cfm-oam/cfm-oam.xhtml Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Here is an update on this topic: > > 19. Common OAM proposal / Layer Independent OAM > 19.1. Description - proposal made by Tissa Senevirathne and a group of > TRILL contributors at the IEEE 802.1 meetings in July and September to > reuse the IEEE 802.1ag frame format for TRILL OAM. Needs coordination > and architectural consistency with the IEEE 802.1 architecture and OAM > practice. > > - 8/20/13: The TRILL WG re-chartered, new charter includes OAM. > Rechartering was communicated on the mail list. > > - 9/25/13: Liaison Statement sent by the TRILL chairs to the IEEE 802 > informing on the status of the work. > > - 12/9/13: draft-ietf-trill-oam-framework approved by the IESG > > - 1/22/14: new liaison statement sent by TRILL to IEEE 802.1 > > - Status 1/27/14 (Norman Finn, Donald): liaison from TRILL asking for > code points from the Connectivity Fault Management protocol, Ethernet > OAM, as was done with ITU a few years back. It allocates the blocks of > code points to the IETF with the understanding that they will be > assigned by IANA based on IETF Standards Actions and TRILL will be an > early user of some values. Expected to pass. > > - Status 9/15/14 (Dan Romascanu): New Non-WG Mailing List: Lime -- Layer > Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment (LIME) discussion > list - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime. Working on a > charter, may request a BOF at IETF-91 > > - Status 1/20/15 (Dan): while most of the TRILL OAM work progresses, the > LIME WG was formed and its charter explicitly calls for coordination > with other SDOs including the IEEE > > - Status 6/15/15 (Dan): TRILL - MIB work waiting for expert review, YANG > document in WG; LIME - no WG I-Ds yet > > - August 2015: call for adoption of draft-tissa-lime-yang-oam-model-06 > as LIME WG document in LIME, announcement sent to the ieee-ietf list, now > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model/ > > - Individual submission to follow: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-lime-yang-oam-model-applicability/ > (applicability document) > > - draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib-11.txt approved by the IESG > > 19.2. Relevant Documents > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-oam-req - published as > RFC 6905 > > http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2012/liaison-tissa-oam-ieee- > trill-0912-v02.pptx > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-oam-framework/ - > published as RFC 7174 > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-oam-fm/ published as > RFC 7455 > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/trill/charter/ > > http://ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2014/new-senevirathne-trill-oam- > liaison-0114-v01.pptx > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-yang-oam/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-oam-mib/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1302/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lime/charter/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model/ > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-lime-yang-oam-model-applicability/ > > > 19.3. Owners - Alia Atlas, Benoit Claise, Norm Finn > > > 19.4. Action Items > Follow the TRILL OAM documents progress in the WG and send them for > review to IEEE 802.1 when they reach milestones (WGLC, IETF LC) > > This work item will remain open to monitor the status, as well as other > more OAM-related I-Ds in the TRILL Working Group that should be reviewed > by IEEE 802.1. > > TRILL and LIME documents to be communicated for review when relevant to > the IEEE 802 (at LC) > > *The update, received from the LIME chairs:* > 1. Draft-zhuang-lime-yang-oam-model-applicability is under development > 2. Draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model is on hold waiting for > draft-zhuang-lime-yang-oam-model-applicability > 3. As it was difficult to find commonalities, > draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model is being split into connectionless and > connection-oriented parts > > Regarding TRILL, the update should come from Alia. > > Regards, Benoit > > _______________________________________________ > ieee-ietf-coord mailing list > ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord > >
- [ieee-ietf-coord] Issue 19: Common OAM proposal /… Benoit Claise
- Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Issue 19: Common OAM propos… Donald Eastlake