[ieee-ietf-coord] FW: [new-work] WG Review: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (teas)
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 26 November 2014 10:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5541A89EF for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 02:08:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6puuOY_wz6Hj for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 02:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827ED1A89B8 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 02:08:38 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnMFAF+ldVSHCzIm/2dsb2JhbABbgmMjUlcEtAEBAQEBAQEGlA2GTQKBCxYBAQEBAQF8hAIBAQEBAxIoNBcEAgEIDQQBAwEBCwISCQcyFAMEAQEFAwIEEwgTB4geAQywVaBxAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIY3ihM4BoMogR8Fhk2MFoRliGmDWYMnil2ECoN8d4FIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,461,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="93840626"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2014 05:08:36 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 26 Nov 2014 05:08:36 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:08:34 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [new-work] WG Review: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (teas)
Thread-Index: AQHQCPTRbYOTENdhr0GD2xOHFMsV35xyr+dw
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:08:34 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C91252A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <20141125211305.29982.31871.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141125211305.29982.31871.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/mAN33qnBedhbI24vMeeogeGmnh0
Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] FW: [new-work] WG Review: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (teas)
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:08:42 -0000
Please forward to the relevant WGs in IEEE 802. Thanks and Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: new-work [mailto:new-work-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The > IESG > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:13 PM > To: new-work@ietf.org > Subject: [new-work] WG Review: Traffic Engineering Architecture and > Signaling (teas) > > A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Routing Area. The IESG > has not made any determination yet. The following draft charter was > submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your > comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg at ietf.org) by 2014-12-02. > > Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (teas) > ------------------------------------------------ > Current Status: Proposed WG > > Chairs: > Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com> > Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> > > Assigned Area Director: > Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> > > Mailing list > Address: teas@ietf.org > To Subscribe: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=AAICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1 > SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=8zSoCW > NzuqGD2hHUFOKAUy0JOej94Zj4TlDWdmjGpNA&s=- > 1Pal0_I2Q2UMbdSGM3bqMFHVg5J3dP5XB9AC9ekR-M&e= > Archive: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mail- > 2Darchive_web_teas_&d=AAICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGx > R31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=8zSoCWNzuqGD2hHUFOKA > Uy0JOej94Zj4TlDWdmjGpNA&s=Q6YCRJkJJWtV_I6JwV2qPfejOXk8URJP3K8r > bFNBQc8&e= > > Charter: > > The Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling (TEAS) Working Group is > responsible for defining MPLS and GMPLS traffic engineering architecture, > standardizing the RSVP-TE signaling protocol, and identifying required related > control-protocol functions, i.e., routing and path computation element > functions. > > Traffic Engineering (TE) is the term used to refer to techniques that enable > operators to control how specific traffic flows are treated within their > networks. TE is applied to packet networks via MPLS TE tunnels and LSPs. The > MPLS-TE control plane was generalized to additionally support non-packet > technologies via GMPLS. RSVP-TE is the signaling protocol used for both > MPLS-TE and GMPLS. > > The TEAS WG is responsible for: > > a) Traffic-engineering architectures for generic applicability > across packet and non-packet networks. This includes both > networks that include the use of PCE and those that do not. > The PCE architecture itself is out of the WG scope. > > b) Definition of protocol-independent metrics and parameters > (measurement and/or service attributes) for describing > links and tunnels/paths required for traffic engineering > (and related routing, signaling and path computation). > These will be developed in conjunction with requests and > requirements from other WGs to ensure overall usefulness. > > c) Functional specification of extensions for routing (OSPF, > ISIS) and for path computation (PCE) to provide general > enablers of traffic-engineering systems that also use > RSVP-TE. Protocol formats and procedures that embody these > extensions will be done in coordination with the WGs > supervising those protocols. > > d) Functional specification of generic (i.e., not data plane > technology-specific) extensions for RSVP-TE, and the > associated protocol formats and procedures that embody > these extensions. > > e) Definition of control plane mechanisms and extensions to allow > the setup and maintenance of TE paths and TE tunnels that span > multiple domains and/or switching technologies, where a > domain may be an IGP area, an Autonomous System, or any other > region of topological visibility. > > f) Definition and extension of management and security techniques > for RSVP-TE signaling. This includes configuring and monitoring > RSVP-TE as well as mechanisms used to configure, control, and > report OAM within TE networks. YANG and MIB modules may be > considered. > > The TEAS working group is chartered to deliver the following: > > 1. Definition of additional abstract service, link, and path > properties such as jitter, delay, and diversity. Extensions > to IGPs to advertise these properties, and extensions to > RSVP-TE to request and to accumulate these properties. Work > with PCE WG to include these properties in computation > requests. > > 2. Specification of terminology, architecture, and protocol > requirements for abstraction and distribution of TE > information between interconnected TE domains/layers. > > 3. Specification and protocol extensions for a GMPLS External > Network-to-Network Interface (E-NNI), i.e., multi-domain > GMPLS support. > > 4. Protocol mechanisms to signal associated LSPs in particular > with different source nodes. > > 5. Requirements and protocol extensions for additional protection > mechanisms including end-point protection, protection of P2MP > LSPs, and inter-domain protection. > > 6. YANG models for a Traffic Engineering Database in coordination > with working groups working on YANG models for network > topology and for technology-specific network attributes. > > Requirements may be documented in stand-alone RFCs, may be folded into > architecture or solutions RFCs, may be recorded on a wiki, or may be > documented in an Internet-Draft that is not progressed to RFC. > > The TEAS WG will coordinate with the following working groups: > > - With the MPLS WG to maintain and extend MPLS-TE protocol > mechanisms and to determine whether they should be generalized. > > - With the CCAMP WG to maintain and extend non-packet, data plane > technology-specific TE protocol mechanisms and to determine > whether they should be generalized. > > - With the OSPF and ISIS WGs to maintain or extend TE routing > mechanisms for MPLS-TE and GMPLS. > > - With the PCE WG on uses of a PCE in the traffic-engineering > architecture, on PCE extensions per the above, and on RSVP-TE > extensions to support PCE WG identified requirements. > > - With the IDR WG on the use of BGP-LS in TE environments. > > In doing this work, the WG will cooperate with external SDOs (such as the > ITU-T and the IEEE 802.1) as necessary. > > Milestones: > > TBD > > _______________________________________________ > new-work mailing list > new-work@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_new- > 2Dwork&d=AAICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQz > vlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=8zSoCWNzuqGD2hHUFOKAUy0JOej94Zj4Tl > DWdmjGpNA&s=Bs99k31SHNZBvOZRKxqH1ns736ryJYnkIjI-U_2s_MA&e=
- [ieee-ietf-coord] FW: [new-work] WG Review: Traff… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)