Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep recharter

Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Mon, 18 December 2006 14:49 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwJoB-0000DE-DL; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:49:39 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwJoA-0000D7-5y for ieprep@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:49:38 -0500
Received: from amer-mta08.csc.com ([20.137.52.152]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwJo7-0001vk-Rh for ieprep@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:49:38 -0500
Received: from amer-gw09.amer.csc.com (amer-gw09.amer.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta08.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id kBIEnWmw024277; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:49:33 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <9D18525F6EF33947BDEF23374EF26C7A06CC2A@stntexch11.cis.neustar.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep recharter
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OF8DF19C25.6C573C84-ON85257248.005152BE-85257248.00516FAD@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:49:30 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 12/18/2006 09:48:26 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: fluffy@cisco.com, ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org


The deadline for BOF submissions for Prague is Jan 15th.  Is that
reasonable to aim for, or is Chicago a better choice?

Janet


"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote on 12/18/2006 08:30:03 AM:

>
> To the IEPREP WG,
>
> After considerable deliberation within the IESG, I am sorry to
> report that the IESG is not comfortable approving the IEPREP charter
> as it stands.
>
> In particular, the IESG is concerned about a perceived lack of focus
> in the deliverables, and collectively feels that it is difficult to
> assess the support of the community for this charter. Some of the
> open-endedness in the charter about non-real-time communications has
> given rise to questions about the diverse expertise required to
> complete the work. Concerns about whether or not the IETF is the
> proper venue for this work continue to be expressed within the IESG as
well.
>
> At this time, the rough consensus in the IESG is that in order for
> the charter to progress, the community would have to affirm its
> support for the work in the context of a BoF. The IESG is willing to
> participate in honing the charter for such a BoF if this is the
> direction you'd like to take it.
>
> I am sorry after such a long time to be returning with another
> negative response. I do believe that the response reflects an
> informed consensus of the IESG.
>
> Jon Peterson
> NeuStar, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list
> Ieprep@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep


_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep