Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6-10 - discussion request]
Mpierce1@aol.com Tue, 12 November 2002 20:54 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15222 for <ieprep-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:54:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gACKv2U29757 for ieprep-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:57:02 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gACKv2v29754 for <ieprep-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:57:02 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15192 for <ieprep-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:54:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gACKu3v29633; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:56:03 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gACKtav29529 for <ieprep@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:55:36 -0500
Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15081 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:52:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Mpierce1@aol.com
Received: from Mpierce1@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id 5.15c.16d0af52 (3940); Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:55:11 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <15c.16d0af52.2b02c4af@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:55:11 -0500
Subject: Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6-10 - discussion request]
To: sob@harvard.edu, hgs@cs.columbia.edu
CC: ieprep@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_15c.16d0af52.2b02c4af_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows XP US sub 51
Sender: ieprep-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
In a message dated 11/11/2002 11:34:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, sob@harvard.edu writes: > > a permissible call defect rate of 0.00001% > > 1/ I've not heard of an FCC requirement but maybe > > 2/ what is a defect - in the context of the Internet? > I would doubt that it is a dropped packet > [MAP] This relates to my comment yesterday about (draft) ITU-T Y.1530 which defines a number of "call defects" for voice over IP. I suggest that reference be made to that draft for formal definitions of end-to-end performance, including "defects". Then this group can carry on easier discussions of what the numbers should be for various situations. I'm sure we can get the okay to make a copy of the latest draft (from last week) available. Briefly, Y.1530 (draft) defines: Connection Setup Delay Connection Post-Selection Delay Connection Answer Signal Delay Connection Disconnect Delay Connection Release Delay Connection Set-up Error Probability Connection Set-up Failure Probability Connection Premature Disconnect Probability Connection Clearing Failure Probability Although ITU-T in the past dealt with circuit switched, the end-to-end performance parameters defined in this draft have been modified to apply to packet technology. If anything, the use of IP introduces the need for additional parameters, since it introduces additional degradations of quality. One thing that is missing seems to be the notion that a call can be successfully set up, the party answers, and then there is no media path available. (Didn't happen in the circuit switched world.) This is what Henning commented about on Nov 11 with: - Call rings, callee picks up and then there's no conversation (due to failure of local resource reservation; this is the problem the PacketCable folks worried about since they need to manage the very limited upstream bandwidth) Separately, Y.1541 covers transmission parameters of: Packet Transfer Delay Packet Delay Variation Packet Loss Ratio Packet Error Ratio I suppose that the case Henning mentioned could simply be thought of as Packet loss ratio = 100%. Mike Pierce Artel
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Daniel Sullivan
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Mpierce1
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Scott Bradner
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Mpierce1
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Bill Woodcock
- [Ieprep] Re: IETF process RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: IETF process Scott Bradner
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: IETF process RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: IETF process Scott Bradner
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: IETF process RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Mpierce1
- [Ieprep] Re: more process discussion RJ Atkinson
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Bill Woodcock
- RE: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Gary Thom
- RE: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Nguyen, An
- Re: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… RJ Atkinson
- FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - reqs 6… Gary Thom
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Gary Thom
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Gary Thom
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Mpierce1
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Scott Bradner
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- [Ieprep] Re: QoS in the network RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Ken Carlberg
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Ken Carlberg
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Scott Bradner
- [Ieprep] Measurement of Internet Congestion RJ Atkinson
- [Ieprep] Re: VoIP in Enterprise LANs RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [Ieprep] Measurement of Internet Congestion Bill Woodcock
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: VoIP in Enterprise LANs Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Scott Bradner
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ieprep] Measurement of Internet Congestion RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Scott Bradner
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… King, Kimberly S.
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… King, Kimberly S.
- [Ieprep] last-mile connectivity, link-state optim… RJ Atkinson
- [Ieprep] quality of measurement/simulation, rever… RJ Atkinson
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Bill Woodcock
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ieprep] quality of measurement/simulation, r… Ken Carlberg
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Mpierce1
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Scott Bradner
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Scott Bradner
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Sean Donelan
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Rex Buddenberg
- Re: FW: [Re: [Ieprep] ieprep-requirements-01 - re… Mpierce1