Re: [Ieprep] Atlanta ieprep Agenda

On Friday, Nov 8, 2002, at 11:12 America/Montreal, King, Kimberly S. 
wrote:
> draft-ietf-ieprep-requirements-01.txt		25 minutes
> Requirements will be discussed one by one.
> Hal Folts

Seems to me like there needs to be a major document spin, based on 
existing
list feedback, before we waste another 25 minutes discussing an old 
document
that clearly needs a major editing pass before it goes anyplace.  And I 
do
NOT plan to repeat all my comments to date at the meeting (sound of 
cheers
in the background) because I expect them to be <#include list-feedback>
included by reference.

> draft-ietf-ieprep-framework-02.txt			10 minutes
> Clarification on any outstanding issues.
> Ken Carlberg

Not keen about discussing this absent a document spin either,
since it also quite clearly needs major editing, but at least
we will only waste 10 minutes not 25.

> Accounting		   	             			10 minutes
> Should Accounting be an ieprep requirement?
> Mike Pierce
>
> draft-polk-ieprep-scenarios-01.txt 	 		5 minutes
> Document is in WG last-call. The WG should discuss any remaining 
> issues.
> James Polk

Those seem reasonable.  It will probably help focus things a whole lot
if "accounting" is replaced by a much more precise term/definition.
Adding accounting to the overall Internet Architecture would represent
a huge change to the architecture so seems like a very bad idea.  I
hope/suspect something else is being proposed.  Clarity in what is
meant/intended/sought would be good.

Ran

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep